> "CA" == Chris Adams writes:
CA> Just as an FYI: I'm not sure fail2ban supports that out of the box,
CA> but it is easy enough to:
True, but denyhosts has the concept of a central synchronization server
which can be shared by all installations globally. The original
incarnation (by the ori
Once upon a time, Jason L Tibbitts III said:
> In general, fail2ban is simply a far better choice. The primary feature
> it appears to lack is the ability to synchronize lists of blocked hosts
> between machines. (And I could be quite wrong about that.)
Just as an FYI: I'm not sure fail2ban sup
