Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> Unfortunately, this state of affairs has ended. Libusb, one of
> novacom's dependencies has been retired, and it's not clear to me that
> it's worthwhile (or even possible) to keep novacom alive.
Does this not build against libusb-compat-0.1-devel? (That has been the
rep
On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 22:28 -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > So, unless I hear from someone who wants it within the next week and
> > has a plan on how to fix the current FTBFS bug[2], on August 23, I will
> > retire novacom-client[3] and no
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> So, unless I hear from someone who wants it within the next week and
> has a plan on how to fix the current FTBFS bug[2], on August 23, I will
> retire novacom-client[3] and novacom-server[4].
I would suggest just orphaning the packages. This wa
