Re: Inclusion user rpm macros file in spec

2010-06-04 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
30.05.2010 21:19, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) ?: 21.05.2010 20:58, Panu Matilainen ?: On Fri, 21 May 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: I think because macroses should be included before it processed as shell script. Is there some var

Re: Inclusion user rpm macros file in spec

2010-05-30 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
21.05.2010 20:58, Panu Matilainen ?: On Fri, 21 May 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: I think because macroses should be included before it processed as shell script. Is there some variant of %include or similar? AFAIK, no. E.g. in kde-f

Re: Inclusion user rpm macros file in spec

2010-05-21 Thread Panu Matilainen
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: >> I think because macroses should be included before it processed as shell >> script. >> Is there some variant of %include or similar? > > AFAIK, no. E.g. in kde-filesystem, we end up defining things twice, once

Re: Inclusion user rpm macros file in spec

2010-05-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: > I think because macroses should be included before it processed as shell > script. > Is there some variant of %include or similar? AFAIK, no. E.g. in kde-filesystem, we end up defining things twice, once for the specfile itself and once for the .macros f