On Fri, Feb 7, 2025, 05:20 Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 6:16 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:37 PM Richard Shaw
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > It seems to be the only reason for FTBFS. A single test is failing.
>> Upstream has no interest in supporting 32bit anym
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 6:16 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:37 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > It seems to be the only reason for FTBFS. A single test is failing.
> Upstream has no interest in supporting 32bit anymore, which I think makes
> sense.
> >
>
> IMO this is much to
I’ve suggested https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openexr/pull-request/9
to restore i686 support and skip the failing test, at least for the time
being.
On 2/6/25 7:15 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:37 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
It seems to be the only reason for FTBFS. A s
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:37 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> It seems to be the only reason for FTBFS. A single test is failing. Upstream
> has no interest in supporting 32bit anymore, which I think makes sense.
>
> For posterity here are the potential affected packages:
>
> $ fedrq whatrequires-src -
