On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 07:01:22PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 03. 20 18:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 06:15:13PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 26. 03. 20 18:13, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > > > E.g. is it going to be after mid-May or before?
> > > > I have to say that
On 26. 03. 20 18:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 06:15:13PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 26. 03. 20 18:13, Tomas Mraz wrote:
E.g. is it going to be after mid-May or before?
I have to say that the schedule of the OpenSSL 3.0 release is a little
bit conflicting with the F33 sched
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 06:15:13PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 03. 20 18:13, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > E.g. is it going to be after mid-May or before?
> > I have to say that the schedule of the OpenSSL 3.0 release is a little
> > bit conflicting with the F33 schedule. However I should be able
On 26. 03. 20 18:13, Tomas Mraz wrote:
E.g. is it going to be after mid-May or before?
I have to say that the schedule of the OpenSSL 3.0 release is a little
bit conflicting with the F33 schedule. However I should be able to have
a rebase to a beta version of OpenSSL 3.0 prepared at the end of J
On Thu, 2020-03-26 at 17:11 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 03. 20 17:07, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 09:34 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 24. 03. 20 13:22, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > > Most probably we will revert this
> > > > change in upstream 1.1.1 branch and I will update
On 26. 03. 20 17:07, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 09:34 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 03. 20 13:22, Tomas Mraz wrote:
Most probably we will revert this
change in upstream 1.1.1 branch and I will update the rawhide build
with the revert patch as well.
Can this please happen rath
On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 09:34 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24. 03. 20 13:22, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > Most probably we will revert this
> > change in upstream 1.1.1 branch and I will update the rawhide build
> > with the revert patch as well.
>
> Can this please happen rather sooner than later?
I'v
> The list of (likely) affected packages is growing:
>
> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/affected-by/openssl-libs?epoch1=1&version1=1.1.1d&release1=7.fc33&epoch2=1&version2=1.1.1e&release2=1.fc33&collection=f33
It's a useful list! Thanks.
Note rubygem-puma is added to the list too.
--
Jun | He
On 24. 03. 20 13:22, Tomas Mraz wrote:
Most probably we will revert this
change in upstream 1.1.1 branch and I will update the rawhide build
with the revert patch as well.
Can this please happen rather sooner than later?
The list of (likely) affected packages is growing:
https://koschei.fedor
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 1:22:37 PM
> > Subject: Re: Heads up: OpenSSL-1.1.1e coming to Rawhide
> >
> > On Sun, 2020-03-22 at 17:29 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 19. 03. 20 17:31, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > > The new openssl-1.1.1e is coming to Ra
- Original Message -
> From: "Tomas Mraz"
> To: "Miro Hrončok" , "Development discussions related to
> Fedora"
> Cc: "python-maint"
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 1:22:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Heads up: OpenSSL-1.1.1e comi
On Sun, 2020-03-22 at 17:29 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 03. 20 17:31, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > The new openssl-1.1.1e is coming to Rawhide.
> >
> > It reports premature EOF/improper shutdown on TLS connections more
> > properly. However this might make some dependencies broken in build
> > te
On 22. 03. 20 17:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 03. 20 17:31, Tomas Mraz wrote:
The new openssl-1.1.1e is coming to Rawhide.
It reports premature EOF/improper shutdown on TLS connections more
properly. However this might make some dependencies broken in build
tests (such as Ruby).
As I would l
On 19. 03. 20 17:31, Tomas Mraz wrote:
The new openssl-1.1.1e is coming to Rawhide.
It reports premature EOF/improper shutdown on TLS connections more
properly. However this might make some dependencies broken in build
tests (such as Ruby).
As I would like to eventually update the openssl also
14 matches
Mail list logo
