Re: Heads up! Erlang package becomes modularized in Fedora.

2010-04-12 Thread Adam Jackson
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 16:56 +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > I did some investigation, and find a way to completely modularize > whole Erlang package. In a few words - main package consists of purely > virtual 'erlang' package and a dozens of sub-packages (from > erlang-appmon to erlang-xmerl - one

Re: Heads up! Erlang package becomes modularized in Fedora.

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:31 PM, James Antill wrote: > On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 10:33 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Nicolas Mailhot >> wrote: >> > Le dimanche 11 avril 2010 à 10:06 +0400, Peter Lemenkov a écrit : >> >> Hello! >> >> >> >> 2010/4/10 Nicolas Mailhot : >>

Re: Heads up! Erlang package becomes modularized in Fedora.

2010-04-12 Thread James Antill
On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 10:33 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Nicolas Mailhot > wrote: > > Le dimanche 11 avril 2010 à 10:06 +0400, Peter Lemenkov a écrit : > >> Hello! > >> > >> 2010/4/10 Nicolas Mailhot : > >> > >> > So you are proposing a metapackage. Fedora has histor

Re: Heads up! Erlang package becomes modularized in Fedora.

2010-04-11 Thread Chris Weyl
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le dimanche 11 avril 2010 à 10:06 +0400, Peter Lemenkov a écrit : >> Hello! >> >> 2010/4/10 Nicolas Mailhot : >> >> > So you are proposing a metapackage. Fedora has historically frowned at >> > metapackages, we prefer to create comps groups

Re: Heads up! Erlang package becomes modularized in Fedora.

2010-04-11 Thread Yaakov Nemoy
Hi, 2010/4/11 Peter Lemenkov : > Hello! > > 2010/4/10 Nicolas Mailhot : > >> So you are proposing a metapackage. Fedora has historically frowned at >> metapackages, we prefer to create comps groups to bundle multiple >> packages together. > > Sorry, but this looks like purely non-technical argumen

Re: Heads up! Erlang package becomes modularized in Fedora.

2010-04-11 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dimanche 11 avril 2010 à 10:06 +0400, Peter Lemenkov a écrit : > Hello! > > 2010/4/10 Nicolas Mailhot : > > > So you are proposing a metapackage. Fedora has historically frowned at > > metapackages, we prefer to create comps groups to bundle multiple > > packages together. > > Sorry, but this

Re: Heads up! Erlang package becomes modularized in Fedora.

2010-04-10 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello! 2010/4/10 Nicolas Mailhot : > So you are proposing a metapackage. Fedora has historically frowned at > metapackages, we prefer to create comps groups to bundle multiple > packages together. Sorry, but this looks like purely non-technical argument for me (I mean using verbs like "prefer",

Re: Heads up! Erlang package becomes modularized in Fedora.

2010-04-10 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2010/4/10 Colin Walters : >> Also I'm sure that we need to push this >> change into both F-12 > > I object to this on general principle.  Pushing sweeping changes to > infrastructure packages is not what stable updates are for. This update is fully API/ABI compatible with previous monolithic pack

Re: Heads up! Erlang package becomes modularized in Fedora.

2010-04-10 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le samedi 10 avril 2010 à 16:56 +0400, Peter Lemenkov a écrit : > I did some investigation, and find a way to completely modularize > whole Erlang package. In a few words - main package consists of purely > virtual 'erlang' package and a dozens of sub-packages (from > erlang-appmon to erlang-xmerl

Re: Heads up! Erlang package becomes modularized in Fedora.

2010-04-10 Thread Colin Walters
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > > I did some investigation, and find a way to completely modularize > whole Erlang package. Sounds great! > Also I'm sure that we need to push this > change into both F-12 I object to this on general principle. Pushing sweeping changes t