On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:45:09 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > yum-utils
> >
>
> I don't think yum-utils should be on that list given that it appears to be
> actively maintained and not obsoleted.
All these src.rpms build _something_ that is obsoleted by something else.
For yum-utils, it's the y
> yum-utils
>
I don't think yum-utils should be on that list given that it appears to be
actively maintained and not obsoleted.
Peter
> zeitgeist-datahub
>
> [...]
>
> chktex-1.6.4-12.fc19.src.rpm
> classads-1.0.8-7.fc20.src.rpm
> detex-2.8-6.fc20.src.rpm
> drupal6-drush-4.1-7.fc20.src.rpm
> f
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:30:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > If there are no objections, I can just retire all of them.
Okay, I object!
Some of them are sub-packages. Obsolete, but still being built!
For example, yum-plugin-security from yum-utils, obsoleted by yum.
That's really odd.
--
de
> If there are no objections, I can just retire all of them.
The src.rpm names:
chktex
classads
detex
drupal6-drush
ff-utils
gpp4
ibus-table-array30
jadetex
jaxen-bootstrap
joystick
kdirstat
latexdiff
lzma
mate-conf
mate-conf-editor
metapost-metauml
nss-myhostname
openswan
pdfbook
pdfjam
ps2eps
p
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:34:52 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/latexdiff
> > >
> > > Let me rephrase: It is not orphaned/retired/deprecated in pkgdb and
> > > there is no dead.package in GIT and it is not blocked in koji.
> >
> > Right, and yet it'
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:44:02AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> A couple of obsolete packages is still included in Rawhide. Usually
> that means a package has not been retired yet or has been retired
> incompletely:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:25:36PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:22:49 +0200
> Till Maas wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On 19 Aug 2013 19:51, "Till Maas" wrote:
> >
> > > > How did you create the list? At least this one se
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:22:49 +0200
Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On 19 Aug 2013 19:51, "Till Maas" wrote:
>
> > > How did you create the list? At least this one seems to be a false
> > > positive, because it is not retired:
> >
> > Isn't
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On 19 Aug 2013 19:51, "Till Maas" wrote:
> > How did you create the list? At least this one seems to be a false
> > positive, because it is not retired:
>
> Isn't that what he says in the first sentence... Orphaned but not properl
On 19 Aug 2013 19:51, "Till Maas" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:44:02AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > A couple of obsolete packages is still included in Rawhide. Usually
> > that means a package has not been retired yet or has been retired
> > incompletely:
> >
> > https://f
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:44:02AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> A couple of obsolete packages is still included in Rawhide. Usually
> that means a package has not been retired yet or has been retired
> incompletely:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_li
11 matches
Mail list logo
