On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 06:45 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > It causes problems for people who build things outside of chroots with
> > straight rpmbuild, though, if they need to ever build different things
> > with different buildreqs (even as test builds).
> >
> > Admitted
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> It causes problems for people who build things outside of chroots with
> straight rpmbuild, though, if they need to ever build different things
> with different buildreqs (even as test builds).
>
> Admittedly, we like to encourage people to use mock, but people will still
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 09:55 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Anyway, I think that neither of those solutions is far superior in any way.
> Maybe I could drop all the renaming in the compat package and make it conflict
> with guile-devel, but that there seems to be no agreement on whether it is or
> is
On 10/23/2012 12:52 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 12:12 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> This is what I had originally in mind. After trying to realize this idea and
>> consulting it with the maintainer (I'm a comaintainer of guile), it didn't
>> seem
>> right. The problem is that a lot of thin
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 17:13 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> > Well, I don't mind doing that, but I'd like to be sure there's a broad
> > consensus that this is the way to go first. I don't think 'duelling
> > drafts' is the best way to decide on what d
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> Well, I don't mind doing that, but I'd like to be sure there's a broad
> consensus that this is the way to go first. I don't think 'duelling
> drafts' is the best way to decide on what direction to go; I'd rather
> make sure we agree on the direction f
On 10/23/2012 03:44 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> Parallel installable guile interpreters:
>> http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-1.8/filelist
>> http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-2.0/filelist
>
> So both new and old g
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 16:25 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:58:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> > > """
> > > Compat Package Conflicts
> > > It is acceptable to use Conflicts: in some cases involving c
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:58:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> > """
> > Compat Package Conflicts
> > It is acceptable to use Conflicts: in some cases involving compat packages.
> > These are the cases where it is not feasible to pa
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> """
> Compat Package Conflicts
> It is acceptable to use Conflicts: in some cases involving compat packages.
> These are the cases where it is not feasible to patch applications to look
> in alternate locations for the -compat files, so t
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:44:11PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > Parallel installable guile interpreters:
> > http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-1.8/filelist
> > http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-2.0/filelist
>
>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Parallel installable guile interpreters:
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-1.8/filelist
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-2.0/filelist
So both new and old guile scripts need to be patched to call
the right binary
On 10/23/2012 12:12 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> This is what I had originally in mind. After trying to realize this idea and
> consulting it with the maintainer (I'm a comaintainer of guile), it didn't
> seem
> right. The problem is that a lot of things have to be renamed, including some
> autotools
On 10/23/2012 11:55 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> I agree, updating 21 packages is a bit too much at this point in F18
> schedule.
>
> However, a way to make this work for F18 would be creating a parallel
> installable guile20 package. So instead of what you are planning now:
>
> guile-2.0.x
> compat
On 10/23/2012 11:42 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 11:15 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
>>>
>>> Once the compat package lan
On 10/23/2012 11:15 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
>>
>> Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I will leave some time for the
>> tra
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
>
> Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I will leave some time for the
> transition (I may work on the required patches if time
17 matches
Mail list logo
