Does
Error: nothing provides librpm.so.3()(64bit) needed by
grub2-tools-1:2.02-0.18.fc23.x86_64.
nothing provides librpm.so.3()(64bit) needed by
grub2-tools-1:2.02-0.18.fc23.x86_64.
nothing provides librpm.so.3()(64bit) needed by
grub2-tools-1:2.02-0.18.fc23.x86_64.
looks as issue for you? NO? the
Haïkel wrote:
> I see no emergency, F23 package was updated this friday, and as
> *nothing is broken*,
Something is broken: the upgrade path.
I'm fed up of those upgrade path problems coming up all the time. You MUST
build your new packages for Rawhide first. It is NOT acceptable to submit a
ne
I spotted this problem when I was drinking beer with my friend. I wrote
this mail because it's not first time when grub is older in rawhide than in
XXX. I can't really file bugs in RHBZ while I'm not with laptop, only with
PHONE.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 7:53 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Sun,
Hi,
I see no emergency, F23 package was updated this friday, and as
*nothing is broken*,
that could have waited Peter's feedback.
Yes, this is an open source project, but we can respect other
contributors right to enjoy
their week-end peacefully.
Had it broke something, I'd have understood not wa
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 12:33:39PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 01:26:17PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >>Hi, Peter did bump to 0.18 in f23 to fix building on aarch64, but
> >> haven't
> >>did the sam
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 01:26:17PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>Hi, Peter did bump to 0.18 in f23 to fix building on aarch64, but haven't
>>did the same for rawhide. Therefore we have older version in rawhide which
>>is not
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 01:26:17PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>Hi, Peter did bump to 0.18 in f23 to fix building on aarch64, but haven't
>did the same for rawhide. Therefore we have older version in rawhide which
>is not good. Please fix it.
Hi Igor,
I have to ask the same question a
