On 25-02-07 22:13, Neel Chauhan wrote:
Hi,
I have a package awaiting review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2342141
Could someone please review this in exchange for me reviewing another
package?
I want to package Retro AIM Server but need this in first.
-Neel
Hi,
I'll try
On Tue Apr 2, 2024 at 17:16 +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
> Hi Maxwell & Go SIG,
Hi Dan,
Thank you for reaching out!
> we have recently started working on introducing a bundled() provides
> generator for golang in openSUSE and found a very simple solution using
> the output of `go version -m /path/to
Hi Maxwell & Go SIG,
we have recently started working on introducing a bundled() provides
generator for golang in openSUSE and found a very simple solution using
the output of `go version -m /path/to/binary` [1]
The solution is of course only that simple, because we build more or
less all go bina
On 22/07/17 09:57PM, Maxwell G wrote:
> golang 1.18.4 was released a couple days ago. This release has fixes for
> 9 medium (rated by Red Hat Product Security) CVEs, so I will preform a
> rebuild in `rawhide` and `f36` to mitigate them[^0]. See
> https://groups.google.com/g/golang-dev/c/frczlF8OFQ0
Hi Tomáš,
Jul 18, 2022 1:42:30 AM Tomas Hrcka :
> Fedora release engineering is running a mass rebuild of rawhide on 20.6., if
> your changes are merged in rawhide/main branches by then, they will be
> included.
Indeed. The distro-wide mass rebuild has been in the back of my mind, but I'm
not
Hi Maxwell,
Fedora release engineering is running a mass rebuild of rawhide on 20.6.,
if your changes are merged in rawhide/main branches by then, they will be
included.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:57 AM Maxwell G via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi Fedorians and Gophers,
>
> go
On 22/07/04 03:00PM, Maxwell G wrote:
> Later this week, I will be a doing a mass rebuild in F35 for all packages
> that
> require `golang` and provide binaries to mitigate the following CVEs
I completed the rebuild this weekend, but I realized that I probably
should provide an update.
Here is
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 7:03 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> I have been asked to add support for Go external dependencies to Mock
>
>https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/919
>
> I tried to get the information from
>
> https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/go/go-pac
On 1/21/22 00:27, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Tom Stellard:
If you maintain a golang package and you are seeing it fail with the error:
`flag provided but not defined: -Wl,-z,relro`
We can likely drop -Wl,-z,relro completely because it's the binutils
(both for BFD ld and gold).
I like having
* Tom Stellard:
> If you maintain a golang package and you are seeing it fail with the error:
>
> `flag provided but not defined: -Wl,-z,relro`
We can likely drop -Wl,-z,relro completely because it's the binutils
(both for BFD ld and gold).
Thanks,
Florian
___
Le 2020-08-31 18:08, Zdenek Dohnal a écrit :
Hi,
I'm trying to package ipp-usb project
(https://github.com/OpenPrinting/ipp-usb) which is written in Go. I
generated spec file via go2rpm, but several files from source tarball
which supposed to be packaged is not packaged e.g. systemd unit file
i
Hi Zdenek,
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 12:11, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to package ipp-usb project
> (https://github.com/OpenPrinting/ipp-usb) which is written in Go. I
> generated spec file via go2rpm, but several files from source tarball
> which supposed to be packaged is not pack
Note that this proposal was prepared prior to the deadline, but due to
an error in wiki formatting, it did not appear in the queue.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:40 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.15
>
> == Summary ==
> Rebase of Golang package to upcoming vers
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 21:05:19 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Robert,
> i need help reviewing these packages:
>
> - golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
> show_bug.cgi?id=1649059
> - golang-github-census-instrumentation-opencensus-proto https://
Le 2018-08-28 13:27, Neal Gompa a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:06 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
However, my initial objectives were to produce clean prometheus and
grafana Fedora packages, I finished the Go part a few months ago, but
they both include a javascript layer, so I'll probably hav
Le 2018-08-28 13:49, Jakub Cajka a écrit :
Hi Jakub
I could spend some time on most of those (though I'd rather pass on B,
already done my part, and D/E would be the most fun and probably the
most useful for the rest of the SIG).
For B I would much appreciate if you would mark which parts of
- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 10:37:06 AM
> Subject: Re: Golang SIG primary goals?
>
> Hi,
>
> Just to get people thinking
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:06 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
>
> However, my initial objectives were to produce clean prometheus and
> grafana Fedora packages, I finished the Go part a few months ago, but
> they both include a javascript layer, so I'll probably have to spend
> part of my packaging tim
Hi,
Just to get people thinking before the meet…
IMHO, the core objective of the SIG should be to maintain a consistent
self-hosting up-to-date baseline of Go software in rpm form, that can
then be used to build other forms of Fedora deliverables (flatpacks,
coreos images, etc)
That implies
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert-André Mauchin"
> To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 4:42:03 PM
> Subject: Golang SIG primary goals?
>
> Hey guys and gals,
>
> Can we start to discuss this SIG goals? What each of you
Hi Robert,
Maybe a document with Go packaging guidelines would be very helpful.
Also, it would be good document and maintain gofed as part of the go
packager toolkit.
I don't know if they are all already part of golang-SIG, but I'm in to
help improving the wiki pages.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 12:
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Cronenworth"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 8:11:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Golang SIG for Fedora
>
> On 08/09/2018 05:12 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote:
> > I have create
On 08/09/2018 05:12 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote:
I have create the SIG page in the wikihttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Go.
Please add yourself in to the members list if you are interested to participate.
If you have any comments or improvements to the SIG page please bring it up or
just do it:).
- Original Message -
> From: "Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 3:47:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Golang SIG for Fedora
>
> I think we already have tools for that. What
fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to
> Fedora"
> Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 1:05:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Golang SIG for Fedora
>
> Thank you very much for your interest.
>
> I will now create SIG wiki page(and let you know to add yourself there),
&
I think we already have tools for that. What I expect with the SIG is
something that could improve the Go Packaging best practices listed in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Vitor Ramos wrote:
> I think that we can mature in the first moment the S
I think that we can mature in the first moment the SIG, and in other moment,
channels, groups, and subjects in another moment. An approach about the taiga
is about the development of Tools that contemplate the Golang in Fedora Project?
___
devel mailing
W dniu 3.08.2018 o 17:58 Neal Gompa pisze:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM Athos Ribeiro wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:18:29AM -0400, Zachary Snyder wrote:
> > > I will be interested in joining the sig! Frequent GO user and Fedora is my
> > > daily driver. I will not be at flock bu
Count me in for the SIG too, since I maintain ~40 golang packages.
Are there plans to create a golang-sig group too, so that group can be
granted access to golang src.fd.org repositories (like the one that
exists for ruby, for example)?
Fabio (decathorpe)
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 5:27 PM Athos Ribe
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM Athos Ribeiro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:18:29AM -0400, Zachary Snyder wrote:
> > I will be interested in joining the sig! Frequent GO user and Fedora is my
> > daily driver. I will not be at flock but I will see everyone on IRC!
>
I'm interested in join
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:18:29AM -0400, Zachary Snyder wrote:
> I will be interested in joining the sig! Frequent GO user and Fedora is my
> daily driver. I will not be at flock but I will see everyone on IRC!
I will definitely join the sig as well, since I do maintain a few golang
packages.
--
Hi!
+1 from me. I'm learning Go but I hope I can help. :)
Best,
Peter
--
Peter Borsa
https://asrob.eu
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:30 PM Vitor Ramos wrote:
> +1
> I was just thinking about this topic today. As far as I could follow,
> there is already a #fedora-golang channel in IRC. But still l
I will be interested in joining the sig! Frequent GO user and Fedora is my
daily driver. I will not be at flock but I will see everyone on IRC!
Cheers
Zach
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 9:16 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 7:51 AM Jakub Cajka wrote:
> >
> > Thank you very much for you
+1
I was just thinking about this topic today. As far as I could follow, there is
already a #fedora-golang channel in IRC. But still lacking material on Golang
in the SIG (which contrasts with both the project in Golang that exists in the
project Fedora), and related. Count me in to help with th
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 7:51 AM Jakub Cajka wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for your interest.
>
> I will now create SIG wiki page(and let you know to add yourself there),
> IRC channel(#fedora-golang, making it official). I believe we can use
> gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org as the mailing li
Thank you very much for your interest.
I will now create SIG wiki page(and let you know to add yourself there), IRC
channel(#fedora-golang, making it official). I believe we can use
gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org as the mailing list. And as it has been
suggested to the container SIG I will
- Original Message -
> From: "Athos Ribeiro"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2018 11:14:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Golang SIG for Fedora
>
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 02:45:54PM -0500, Michael Cron
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 02:45:54PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 07/27/2018 08:28 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote:
> >There are few big outstanding issues that needs to be solved that need
> > more than individual work, most notably the Go packaging guidelines and
> > tooling. I think that sho
On 08/02/2018 12:45 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 07/27/2018 08:28 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote:
>> There are few big outstanding issues that needs to be solved that
>> need more than individual work, most notably the Go packaging
>> guidelines and tooling. I think that should be one of the first
On 07/27/2018 08:28 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote:
There are few big outstanding issues that needs to be solved that need more
than individual work, most notably the Go packaging guidelines and tooling. I
think that should be one of the first tasks for the SIG.
I'm not looking to join the SIG, but
Hi,
I'm obviously interested, even though I'm not available all year round
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://ge
On vendredi 27 juillet 2018 15:28:12 CEST Jakub Cajka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems that lately there has been more people maintaining Go package in
> the Fedora. I would like to propose to join up and form Go SIG so we could
> better co-ordinate and collaborate on the packaging issues and genera
+1, I started looking on packaging Go libraries and looking for
recommendations. I saw [1] but as this seems more a draft (so a WIP
document) it would be good if we have specific group to discuss best
practices, package reviews, etc.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go
On Fri,
On 08/19/2017 01:36 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
Hello,
When packaging Golang librairies we often use development snapshots instead of
releases. In such case there is two conflicting guidelines regarding
versionning:
- the "main" Guidelines that says the version should be
MMDD
Cf:
- Original Message -
> From: "Gianluca Sforna"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 10:02:55 AM
> Subject: Golang in PPC64
>
> So I am getting the following becasue arduino-builder is a golang
> project and apparently Go is not in ppc64 r
I just discussed it on packaging list.
Maybe we can let everyone edit it and then summarize them up?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
46 matches
Mail list logo
