On 10/02/2014 09:02 AM, Vincent Batts wrote:
> On 30/09/14 08:46 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> How does gccgo affect the packaging of libraries?
>
> The libraries may have support for one or more versions of the go API,
> or exclusively one version. Since the gccgo support is usually an API
On 10/03/2014 04:20 PM, Vincent Batts wrote:
Are you saying that upstream or fedora is holding absurdly high standards?
Fedora. Upstream doesn't address these issues at all.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
- Original Message -
> From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Vincent Batts"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 3:45:05 AM
> Subject: Re: Go packaging
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 0
- Original Message -
> From: "Florian Weimer"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 4:37:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Go packaging
>
> On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote:
> > Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidel
- Original Message -
> From: "Haïkel"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:56:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Go packaging
>
> 2014-09-30 16:20 GMT+02:00 Richard W.M. Jones :
> > On Tue,
On 30/09/14 08:46 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
How does gccgo affect the packaging of libraries?
The libraries may have support for one or more versions of the go API,
or exclusively one version. Since the gccgo support is usually an API
version or so behind, this compatibility would need t
2014-09-30 16:20 GMT+02:00 Richard W.M. Jones :
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
>> @Rich Jones: I agree with you that gaining experience, but that could
>> be done using a copr repository or granting exceptions for a limited
>> set of packages.
>
> Well the specific case w
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> @Rich Jones: I agree with you that gaining experience, but that could
> be done using a copr repository or granting exceptions for a limited
> set of packages.
Well the specific case was that libguestfs has golang bindings, and we
wanted to
2014-09-30 11:42 GMT+02:00 Florian Weimer :
>
> I tried, didn't work. It's not surprising because filing bugs doesn't fix
> them.
>
If package owner doesn't answer or have no good reasons, just CC a
provenpackager and he will fix it for you.
H.
> --
> Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:42:10AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/30/2014 10:53 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote:
> >>>Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
On 09/30/2014 10:53 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote:
Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place.
I think this
@Matthew: I'm just stating a fact, the absence of guidelines does not
mean that we can accept reviews. In this case, you can't help but
violate a few general guidelines when you use the golang toolchain,
for instance: "statically linked executables", that would require an
exception from fesco on ca
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote:
> >Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
> >shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place.
>
> I think this is problematic considering that some other
On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote:
Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place.
I think this is problematic considering that some other languages
violates their language-specific packaging guidelines with co
How does gccgo affect the packaging of libraries?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:54:08PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
> shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place.
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382
While we should be working on packaging guidelines, it has been ver
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:54:08PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
> shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place.
I don't think we have any hard rule that says that we can't package things
in a language for which there is n
On 09/29/2014 12:49 PM, Vincent Batts wrote:
> (Resending as i got a bounce from the list)
>
> On 29/09/14 11:04 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> I'm working on enabling Go on systems without golang support, but for which
>> the
>> gccgo compiler works.
>>
>> But in order for this to work, ther
(resending, as i got a bounce from the list)
On 29/09/14 20:54 +0200, Haïkel wrote:
Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place.
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382
The most urgent issue is to complete the c
(Resending as i got a bounce from the list)
On 29/09/14 11:04 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
I'm working on enabling Go on systems without golang support, but for which the
gccgo compiler works.
But in order for this to work, there needs to be some amount of coordination
with the regular golan
Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place.
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382
The most urgent issue is to complete the current draft and champion it
to the FPC.
Without guidelines, we're just increasing pac
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:14:21AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> # rpm -ql libselinux-devel | grep go
> /usr/share/gocode/src/selinux
> /usr/share/gocode/src/selinux/selinux.go
>
> Is the correct way for C libraries that we ship to provide go bindings?
libguestfs has shipped go bindings in Fedor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/14/2014 02:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:06:09PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> A couple of questions and comments. I think overall, the approach
>> works. # Packaging Libraries This does not mention libraries which
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:06:09PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> A couple of questions and comments. I think overall, the approach works.
> # Packaging Libraries
> This does not mention libraries which use cgo. Should they be
> handled the same way? What about additional C wrappers?
I think fo
On 01/14/2014 01:06 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:11 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
there's a draft, i suggest that you start checking it.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go
A couple of questions and comments. I think overall, the approach works.
# Packaging Libraries
This
On 01/13/2014 04:11 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
there's a draft, i suggest that you start checking it.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go
A couple of questions and comments. I think overall, the approach works.
# Packaging Libraries
This does not mention libraries which use cgo. Sho
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:10PM +0100, H. Guémar wrote:
> As far as i'm concerned, the draft is good enough to be submitted to the
> FPC.
> Still, i'm not confident enough in my go skills to suggest it :)
Me either, but I won't let that stop me.
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382
--
M
As far as i'm concerned, the draft is good enough to be submitted to the
FPC.
Still, i'm not confident enough in my go skills to suggest it :)
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:11:23PM +0100, H. Guémar wrote:
> there's a draft, i suggest that you start checking it.
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go
> Taking a peek at Debian and OpenSuSE Go guidelines might be worthy:
> http://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/packaging.html
> http://en.o
My apologies for linking opensuse guidelines, i missed that point in your
mail.
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi,
there's a draft, i suggest that you start checking it.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go
Taking a peek at Debian and OpenSuSE Go guidelines might be worthy:
http://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/packaging.html
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Go
Best regards,
H.
--
devel m
31 matches
Mail list logo
