Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-05 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-10-05, Tom Lane wrote: > > My particular reason for asking is that I'm looking at a soname bump for > libpng, and if repoquery is telling me the truth, there are about 1200 > packages that will need to be rebuilt. > Few days ago I've been asked by Marcela how should I cope with this proble

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 10:06 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Oct 4, 2011, at 10:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 09:39 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote: > >>> > >>> Ahh I'm late. Anyway, that's a side-effect of using the bod

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-05 Thread Jesse Keating
On Oct 5, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Jesse Keating writes: >> tl;dr if you're looking for bodhi to allow on-demand creation of topic-tags >> for isolating build efforts from rawhide, that's too expensive of an item to >> allow a free-for-all at this time, in my opinion. > > Fair enoug

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
Jesse Keating writes: > tl;dr if you're looking for bodhi to allow on-demand creation of topic-tags > for isolating build efforts from rawhide, that's too expensive of an item to > allow a free-for-all at this time, in my opinion. Fair enough. Is there a policy or guideline on how big a change

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-05 Thread Jesse Keating
On Oct 4, 2011, at 10:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 09:39 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote: >>> >>> Ahh I'm late. Anyway, that's a side-effect of using the bodhi interface >>> to manage something in koji then. It'd still be h

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 09:39 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > > > Ahh I'm late. Anyway, that's a side-effect of using the bodhi interface > > to manage something in koji then. It'd still be handy if we could use > > that for Rawhide so we don't b

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-03 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-09-30, Honza Horak wrote: > On 09/30/2011 11:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: >> Perl has been rebuilt _without_ GDBM in F17 as perl-5.14.1-191.fc17 and >> it's available in build root now. >> >> -- Petr >> > > The new gdbm-1.9.1-1 has just landed in Fedora Rawhide. Please, re-build > your packag

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-30 Thread Honza Horak
On 09/30/2011 11:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > Perl has been rebuilt _without_ GDBM in F17 as perl-5.14.1-191.fc17 and > it's available in build root now. > > -- Petr > The new gdbm-1.9.1-1 has just landed in Fedora Rawhide. Please, re-build your package(s) if depends on gdbm. Also python and perl

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-30 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote: >> >> That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will >> disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM >> support in those languages, please wait until new GDMB and other >> packages (Perl,

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > Ahh I'm late. Anyway, that's a side-effect of using the bodhi interface > to manage something in koji then. It'd still be handy if we could use > that for Rawhide so we don't break all dependent things for people who > want to test something

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-29 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 08:49 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:32:59 +0200 > Nils Philippsen wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:29 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > On 2011-09-21, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > >> Jan Hor

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-29 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-09-29, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote: >>> >>> That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will >>> disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM >>> support in those languages, please wait un

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-29 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote: >> >> That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will >> disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM >> support in those languages, please wait until new GDMB and other >> packages (Perl,

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME > in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the > upgrade will be performed in F17 directly. > > That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:32:59 +0200 Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:29 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > > On 2011-09-21, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > > >> Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new > > >> SONA

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote: > > That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will > disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM > support in those languages, please wait until new GDMB and other > packages (Perl, Python and similar) get recompiled again

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 21.9.2011 13:45, Honza Horak napsal(a): > On 09/21/2011 01:14 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: >>> Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME >>> in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the >

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Honza Horak
On 09/21/2011 01:14 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: >> Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME >> in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the >> upgrade will be performed in F17 directly. >> >

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:29 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2011-09-21, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > >> Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME > >> in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, t

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-09-21, Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: >> Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME >> in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the >> upgrade will be performed in F17 directly. >> >> That m

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME > in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the > upgrade will be performed in F17 directly. > > That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root