Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 04:03:51 -0500 Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > El Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:59:08 -0600 > Kevin Fenzi escribió: > > On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:43:57 -0500 > > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > > Ok, somehow I managed to do the same thing with Op

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-13 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:56:38 -0400 Dodji Seketeli escribió: > Dennis Gilmore a écrit: > > > f18-candidate is the target name and has nothing at all to do with > > any tags, a target has 2 things the tag used to populate the > > buildroot and the tag

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-13 Thread Dodji Seketeli
Dennis Gilmore a écrit: > f18-candidate is the target name and has nothing at all to do with any > tags, a target has 2 things the tag used to populate the buildroot and > the tag that resulting builds are tagged into. > > Right now the f18-candidate target is setup to populate the > buildroot us

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-13 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:59:08 -0600 Kevin Fenzi escribió: > On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:43:57 -0500 > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Ok, somehow I managed to do the same thing with OpenImageIO... > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=437

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:12:36 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Sorry, I was leading you wrong before... Dennis'es reply was > > correct. > > > > Builds go into f18-candidate, which also populates f18-build (the > > buildroot), then at the nightl

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-12 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Sorry, I was leading you wrong before... Dennis'es reply was correct. > > Builds go into f18-candidate, which also populates f18-build (the > buildroot), then at the nightly branched compose they are moved to f18. > > Don't worry about what ta

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:43:57 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, somehow I managed to do the same thing with OpenImageIO... > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4379927 > > Although I'm pretty sure I did the build with "--target f18". Are > there any other options than incrementi

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-12 Thread Richard Shaw
Ok, somehow I managed to do the same thing with OpenImageIO... https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4379927 Although I'm pretty sure I did the build with "--target f18". Are there any other options than incrementing the release and building in both rawhide and f18 again? Richard -

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-12 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:27:28 -0500 > Richard Shaw wrote: >> I built Field3D but it was tagged into f18-candidate and I can neither >> add it to an update or to a buildroot override, so I can't build >> OpenImageIO... > > It was? It shouldn't h

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-11 Thread Dennis Gilmore
The target is f18-candidate it tags the resulting builds into f18 until we switch bodhi on at alpha freeze -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:27:28 -0500 > Rich

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:36:45 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > What!?!?! Ok, I know I wasn't seeing things yesterday. I KNOW it was > in f18-candidate otherwise OpenImageIO wouldn't have failed to build. > Must have gotten moved somehow? I can't think of any reason it would have... > Well I had alre

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-11 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:27:28 -0500 > Richard Shaw wrote: > >> Ok, I'm sure I did something wrong but I'm not exactly sure what I was >> supposed to do... >> >> Due to Boost 1.50 I had a chain of libraries that needed rebuilding: >> >> blender

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:27:28 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, I'm sure I did something wrong but I'm not exactly sure what I was > supposed to do... > > Due to Boost 1.50 I had a chain of libraries that needed rebuilding: > > blender -> OpenImageIO -> Field3D > > I've been able to rebuild the r