On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 11:19:27AM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 06/03/10 10:04, Till Maas wrote:
> --snipped--
> > DB)
> > 3) once a day a crawler reads all files and counts for each package how
> > often they are installed,
> >>
> >> What about uninstalled?
> >>
> >> Update bring in
On 06/03/10 10:04, Till Maas wrote:
--snipped--
> DB)
> 3) once a day a crawler reads all files and counts for each package how
> often they are installed,
>>
>> What about uninstalled?
>>
>> Update bring in upd to X, but package Y,Z. come in.
>> User removes Y,Z without breaking anythi
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 09:34:08AM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 06/03/10 09:04, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 06:18:37PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:42:32AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> >>> Imho for
On 06/03/10 09:04, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 06:18:37PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:42:32AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
>>> Imho for the beginning, there is no need to be able to query complete
>>> profiles,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 06:18:37PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:42:32AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Imho for the beginning, there is no need to be able to query complete
> > profiles, but it would be enough to have a count p
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:42:32AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > It looks like popcon has like 93000 profiles? Smolt has 1.8 million [1]
> > and even at that level without package data we have horrible performance
> > issues. If I were to add packages wi
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:42:32AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> It looks like popcon has like 93000 profiles? Smolt has 1.8 million [1]
> and even at that level without package data we have horrible performance
> issues. If I were to add packages with my knowledge of db's, smolt would
> become u
For anyone who wants to attempt this, there is a very basic and
seemingly abandonded popcon for rpm written in perl for opensuse at:
http://gitorious.org/opensuse/popcorn
(although gitorious.org seems down right now from here).
I agree with Mike that you would really need to figure out a effic
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:48:15PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Aaron Faanes wrote:
> >>
> >> I agree to almost everything you wrote.
> >>
> >>
> >>> - Allow maintainers to see number of
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:57:11PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:48:15PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Aaron Faanes wrote:
>> >
>> > I agree to almost everything you wr
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:48:15PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Aaron Faanes wrote:
>>
>> I agree to almost everything you wrote.
>>
>>
>>> - Allow maintainers to see number of downloads by users who have
>>> opted-in to share that da
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> A couple of problems. Which packages are downloaded from mirrors is not
> currently available to Fedora. [...]
Would it be crazy to reorganize the mirror system in such a way that
normally download http requests come to fedoraproject.org, but are
redirected at the http-
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:57:11PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:48:15PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Aaron Faanes wrote:
> >
> > I agree to almost everything you wrote.
> >
> >
> > > - Allow maintainers to see number of downlo
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:48:15PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Aaron Faanes wrote:
>
> I agree to almost everything you wrote.
>
>
> > - Allow maintainers to see number of downloads by users who have
> > opted-in to share that data. If not number, then a simpl
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 15:48:15 +0100,
> Thomas Janssen wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Aaron Faanes wrote:
>>
>>
>> > - Allow maintainers to see number of downloads by users who have
>> > opted-in to share that data. If not n
>
>> - Allow maintainers to see number of downloads by users who have
>> opted-in to share that data. If not number, then a simple range.
>
>
> *That* would be awesome. Because besides of bugs and some guys in IRC
> who tell you that they like the software you package, you have no
> feedback if y
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 15:48:15 +0100,
Thomas Janssen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Aaron Faanes wrote:
>
>
> > - Allow maintainers to see number of downloads by users who have
> > opted-in to share that data. If not number, then a simple range.
>
>
> *That* would be awesome. Be
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Aaron Faanes wrote:
I agree to almost everything you wrote.
> - Allow maintainers to see number of downloads by users who have
> opted-in to share that data. If not number, then a simple range.
*That* would be awesome. Because besides of bugs and some guys in I
18 matches
Mail list logo
