Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 x86_64

2010-06-02 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 12:43 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > nphilipp: gegl,gtkimageview,ufraw these all built fine as scratch, probably affected by the segfaulting pkgconfig -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safet

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 x86_64

2010-06-01 Thread Dan Horák
Matt Domsch píše v Po 31. 05. 2010 v 12:43 -0500: > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > using rawhide from 2010-05-27 > > This is a full rebuild, the first for Fedora 14's rawhide. The > builders all have Fedora 13 installed. > > Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedor

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 x86_64

2010-05-31 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 04:11:25PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > Doh. This is a result of using tmpfs for the buildroots. There are a > few such failures, which I'll rebuild in the next run w/o using tmpfs. > Odd, as using tmpfs should have started overflowing into swap, which > doesn't appear to

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 x86_64

2010-05-31 Thread Matt Domsch
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 03:54:53PM -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 12:43 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > > using rawhide from 2010-05-27 > > > > This is a full rebuild, the first for Fedora 14's rawhide. The > > builders all

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 x86_64

2010-05-31 Thread Matt Domsch
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 06:53:41PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Dan Hor??k wrote: > > Matt Domsch pe v Po 31. 05. 2010 v 12:43 -0500: > >> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > >> using rawhide from 2010-05-27 > >> > And there are a number of

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 x86_64

2010-05-31 Thread Matt Domsch
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 07:51:52PM +0200, Dan Hor?k wrote: > Matt Domsch pe v Po 31. 05. 2010 v 12:43 -0500: > > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > > using rawhide from 2010-05-27 > > > > This is a full rebuild, the first for Fedora 14's rawhide. The > > builders all have

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 x86_64

2010-05-31 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 12:43 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > using rawhide from 2010-05-27 > > This is a full rebuild, the first for Fedora 14's rawhide. The > builders all have Fedora 13 installed. > > Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedo

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 x86_64

2010-05-31 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
I updated python-sphinx in rawhide this morning to fix the issue seen here:: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/i386/bzr-2.2-0.5.b1.fc14.src.rpm/result/build.log sphinx-build -b html -d _build/doctrees . _build/html Running Sphinx v1.0b1 loading translations [es]..

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 x86_64

2010-05-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Dan Horák wrote: > Matt Domsch píše v Po 31. 05. 2010 v 12:43 -0500: >> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 >> using rawhide from 2010-05-27 >> >> This is a full rebuild, the first for Fedora 14's rawhide.  The >> builders all have Fedora 13 instal

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 x86_64

2010-05-31 Thread Dan Horák
Matt Domsch píše v Po 31. 05. 2010 v 12:43 -0500: > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > using rawhide from 2010-05-27 > > This is a full rebuild, the first for Fedora 14's rawhide. The > builders all have Fedora 13 installed. > > Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedor