Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-15 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/15/2010 02:28 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/15/2010 01:48 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:49:47AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> On 02/15/2010 11:00 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: Following the steps from deltarpm example (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Under

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-15 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/15/2010 01:48 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:49:47AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 02/15/2010 11:00 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: >>> Following the steps from deltarpm example >>> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange#Example_deltarpm) >>> helps me

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-15 Thread Matt Domsch
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:49:47AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/15/2010 11:00 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > Following the steps from deltarpm example > > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange#Example_deltarpm) > > helps me to reproduce the DSO issue in local mock. Th

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-15 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/15/2010 11:00 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > Following the steps from deltarpm example > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange#Example_deltarpm) > helps me to reproduce the DSO issue in local mock. Thanks. Hmm, however this would mean Matt's build-tree diverges from "r

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-15 Thread Jaroslav Skarvada
" Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 8:55:03 AM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna Subject: Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64 On 02/13/2010 04:50 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > using rawhide fr

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-14 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/13/2010 04:50 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > using rawhide from 2010-02-10 > > This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed. > This is responsible for 446 failures noted below. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/C

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-14 Thread Matt Domsch
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:58:53AM +0530, Parag N() wrote: > Hi, > > > fonts-ISO8859-2-1.0-22.fc12 (build/make) pnemade,fonts-sig,i18n-team,pnemade > > > So why is this failed? See the successful koji scratch build => > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1986768 and

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-14 Thread पराग़
Hi, > fonts-ISO8859-2-1.0-22.fc12 (build/make) pnemade,fonts-sig,i18n-team,pnemade So why is this failed? See the successful koji scratch build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1986768 and then official build for F-13 =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-14 Thread Kevin Kofler
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > However, with this new default, a lot of programs will have > to add just: > > -lm > > This seems to be completely unnecessary, because it comes from glibc: > > [cascavel:~/RPMS124/lcgrpms] rpm -qf /lib64/libm.so.6 > glibc-2.11.1-1.x86_64 *nix has a long tradition of a

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-14 Thread Paulo Cavalcanti
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > using rawhide from 2010-02-10 > > This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed. > This is responsible for 446 failures noted below. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 02:50:35AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:04:33 -0600, Matt wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:04:33 -0600, Matt wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: > > > > > > > sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13 > > > > (miss

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Matt Domsch
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: > > > > > sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13 > > > (missing_DSO_to_linker__http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Cha

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread drago01
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > using rawhide from 2010-02-10 > > This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed. > This is responsible for 446 failures noted below.  See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Matt Domsch
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:53:20PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: > >> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > >> using rawhide from 2010-02-10 > >> > >> This run incl

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: >> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 >> using rawhide from 2010-02-10 >> >> This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed. >> This is responsible

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: > > > sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13 > > (missing_DSO_to_linker__http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking) > > itamarjp,cwickert,mschwendt > > How is packa

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: > sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13 > (missing_DSO_to_linker__http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking) > itamarjp,cwickert,mschwendt How is package ownership determined? I have nothing to do anymore with Sylpheed for F-13 or

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Matt Domsch
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > using rawhide from 2010-02-10 > > This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed. > This is responsible for 446 failures noted below. See > http://fedoraproject.

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Till Maas
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: > gpscorrelate-1.6.0-4.fc13 (build/make) till fixed in release 6 by using g++ for linking. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: > > Of those expected to have worked... > Without a bug filed: 659 > -- > glest-3.2.2-2.fc12 (build/make) bruno,bruno I believe I fixed glest on 2010-02-11. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Johan Cwiklinski
Le 13/02/2010 16:50, Matt Domsch a écrit : > trasher: gcompris,homebank,tuxtype2 > gcompris and homebank are already fixed and has been rebuilt. tuxtype2 will be soon, I'm working on it. Regards, Johan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman