Re: Fedora Review Service and setting the AutomationTriaged keyword

2023-12-11 Thread Benson Muite
Many thanks Jakub. It is a helpful tool. Hopefully it will also encourage more community contributions to help improve and update Fedora Review as well. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le.

Re: Fedora Review Service and setting the AutomationTriaged keyword

2023-12-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Thanks for working on this Jakub. I think it's quite useful. :) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Fedora Review Service and setting the AutomationTriaged keyword

2023-12-11 Thread Jakub Kadlcik
Thank you for the feedback Dominik, > Cool! Go for it. > Great idea. I am going for it then :-) On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 10:20 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > On Saturday, 09 December 2023 at 19:32, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > Hello, > > a year ago I announced >

Re: Fedora Review Service and setting the AutomationTriaged keyword

2023-12-09 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Saturday, 09 December 2023 at 19:32, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > Hello, > a year ago I announced > > and > launched the Fedora Review Service >

Re: Fedora Review Service

2023-01-04 Thread Jakub Kadlcik
Hello guys, I just wanted to announce that the service is already deployed and that I am trying to figure out all the quirks and ask you to please be patient. But you were faster :-) Thank you for the reports, please ping me with anything more that you find. I am also trying to monitor what is hap

Re: Fedora Review Service

2023-01-04 Thread Frank Crawford
On Wed, 2023-01-04 at 23:41 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 02. 12. 22 18:20, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > for a couple of years now, I've been interested in the Fedora > > package > > review process. Our queue is in hundreds of waiting packages for as > > long as I can remember.

Re: Fedora Review Service

2023-01-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 02. 12. 22 18:20, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: Hello folks, for a couple of years now, I've been interested in the Fedora package review process. Our queue is in hundreds of waiting packages for as long as I can remember. I believe the situation can be improved. Since summer, I did ~40 package revie

Re: Fedora Review Service

2022-12-03 Thread Jakub Kadlcik
I created the Fedora Infra ticket https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11028 Jakub On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 1:00 PM Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > > fedora-review require a lot of manual checks from reviewer (especially > > licenses). It can't be fully automated. > > That's true but my goal isn

Re: Fedora Review Service

2022-12-03 Thread Jakub Kadlcik
> fedora-review require a lot of manual checks from reviewer (especially > licenses). It can't be fully automated. That's true but my goal isn't to fully automate the process. A person will always be required to take the final look and make sure the spec is reasonably written and the package is ac

Re: Fedora Review Service

2022-12-03 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 02/12/2022 18:20, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: I started working on a service [2] that listens to fedora-messaging and for every new RHBZ review ticket or a new comment with updated packages, it submits a build in Copr. Thanks to this [1] feature, Copr automatically runs the fedora-review tool and gen

Re: Fedora Review Service

2022-12-03 Thread Jakub Kadlcik
Hello, > Where does this service currently run? If it's going to be used "in > anger", perhaps it would be good to put it under fedora-infra control? Currently running on my laptop. Unpackaged and with hardcoded configuration :-) But I agree with you. I will soon create a Fedora infra issue and d

Re: Fedora Review Service

2022-12-02 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 18:20 +0100, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > Hello folks, > > for a couple of years now, I've been interested in the Fedora package > review process. Our queue is in hundreds of waiting packages for as > long as I can remember. I believe the situation can be improved. > > Since summe

Re: Fedora Review Service

2022-12-02 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 at 18:21, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > Hello folks, > > for a couple of years now, I've been interested in the Fedora package > review process. Our queue is in hundreds of waiting packages for as > long as I can remember. I believe the situation can be improved. > > Since summer, I