Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4

2012-11-02 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "RC" == Remi Collet writes: RC> Have you notice than all this bugs depend on #871373 which provides RC> some useful information ? The useful information was not in the ticket. Which means it wasn't in the email. Which means I had to get over to a web browser, wait for bugzilla to load, a

Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4

2012-11-02 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
On 11/01/2012 06:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: It would have been super nice to actually include a link in all of those bugs, or some reference. I mean, they must have been filed by program, so it's not as if you would have had to do a bunch of extra typing. We really need a "mass bug fili

Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4

2012-11-02 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 11/01/2012 05:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: It would have been super nice to actually include a link in all of those bugs, or some reference. I mean, they must have been filed by program, so it's not as if you would have had to do a bunch of extra typing. Most of us do this actually ma

Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4

2012-11-02 Thread Kushal Das
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Le 30/10/2012 15:14, Remi Collet a écrit : >> So I open a tracker bug for this issues >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871373 > > Finally : 60 open bugs. > Thanks for the bugs.

Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4

2012-11-02 Thread Remi Collet
Le 01/11/2012 18:25, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : > It would have been super nice to actually include a link in all of those > bugs, or some reference. I mean, they must have been filed by program, > so it's not as if you would have had to do a bunch of extra typing. No, nothing automatic here.

Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4

2012-11-02 Thread Remi Collet
Le 01/11/2012 18:25, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : > It would have been super nice to actually include a link in all of those > bugs, or some reference. I mean, they must have been filed by program, > so it's not as if you would have had to do a bunch of extra typing. > > We really need a "mass

Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4

2012-11-01 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
It would have been super nice to actually include a link in all of those bugs, or some reference. I mean, they must have been filed by program, so it's not as if you would have had to do a bunch of extra typing. We really need a "mass bug filing howto" or something. Preferably starting with "Don

Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4

2012-11-01 Thread Remi Collet
Le 31/10/2012 22:25, Gianluca Sforna a écrit : > So, befoer I dig into manuals, can you name the most common causes for > breakage? Some explanation on the tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871373 Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fed

Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4

2012-10-31 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > > > I you need more explanation on the required changes, feel free to ask. So, befoer I dig into manuals, can you name the most common causes for breakage? -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://identi.ca/giallu - http:/

Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4

2012-10-30 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 10/30/2012 02:44 PM, Remi Collet wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 30/10/2012 15:14, Remi Collet a écrit : So I open a tracker bug for this issues https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871373 Finally : 60 open bugs. Note : if your package provides an Apache con

Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4

2012-10-30 Thread Remi Collet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 30/10/2012 15:14, Remi Collet a écrit : > So I open a tracker bug for this issues > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871373 Finally : 60 open bugs. Note : if your package provides an Apache configuration file and is not listed here, I