On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:09:51 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
> Are there any objections to moving forward with this? There seems to
> be no objections from the kernel maintainers who have been
> participating in the discussion on test@ but we wanted a bit more
> devel input before moving forward.
Since t
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:09:51PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> Since the beta criterion for running Fedora as a Xen guest (DomU) was
> removed for Fedora 16, there has been some discussion [1] [2] on test@
> about whether or not we should add it back for Fedora 16 final. The old
> criterion read:
>
On 2011-10-10 12:05, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
>> Do any of those cloud providers ever run the stock image or do they roll
>> their own with a custom built kernel anyways? I don't have a lot of
>> insight into this but was just curious what the la
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:23:59PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> I don't think we can dismiss the ability to have Fedora run on the
>> hyerpvisor that powers (by most accounts) 80% of the public clouds.
>> Amazon, RackSpace, Linode, Tata, ID
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:23:59PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> I don't think we can dismiss the ability to have Fedora run on the
> hyerpvisor that powers (by most accounts) 80% of the public clouds.
> Amazon, RackSpace, Linode, Tata, IDCF, and virtually every other major
> compute cloud services
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> Since the beta criterion for running Fedora as a Xen guest (DomU) was
> removed for Fedora 16, there has been some discussion [1] [2] on test@
> about whether or not we should add it back for Fedora 16 final. The old
> criterion read:
>
> The re
