Quoting Paul Howarth (2012-08-02 16:46:39)
> On 08/02/2012 03:36 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > On 08/02/2012 08:29 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >> Maybe it would be better formulated as:
> >> [!]: MUST: Buildroot MUST NOT be present (NOTE: this is not true for
> >> EPEL5)
> >> [!]: MUST: Pa
On 08/02/2012 06:15 PM, José Matos wrote:
On 07/11/2012 06:23 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Dear all,
A new fedora-review is being brought to you.
For me it fails like this:
$ fedora-review -v -n octave-odepkg
Exception down the road...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/pyt
On 07/11/2012 06:23 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> A new fedora-review is being brought to you.
For me it fails like this:
$ fedora-review -v -n octave-odepkg
Exception down the road...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_
On 08/02/2012 03:36 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 08/02/2012 08:29 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Maybe it would be better formulated as:
[!]: MUST: Buildroot MUST NOT be present (NOTE: this is not true for
EPEL5)
[!]: MUST: Package MUST NOT run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
at the
On 08/02/2012 08:29 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Maybe it would be better formulated as:
[!]: MUST: Buildroot MUST NOT be present (NOTE: this is not true for
EPEL5)
[!]: MUST: Package MUST NOT run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
at the beginning of %install
What do you think?
That wo
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 08:23 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 08/02/2012 12:02 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 23:52 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> >> Where would you like bug reports?
> >>
> >> I tried it against one of my own review tickets. It found a number of
> >>
On 08/02/2012 12:02 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 23:52 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Where would you like bug reports?
I tried it against one of my own review tickets. It found a number of
issues however almost all of them except one was wrong.
For example it complained
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 23:52 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> Where would you like bug reports?
>
> I tried it against one of my own review tickets. It found a number of
> issues however almost all of them except one was wrong.
>
> For example it complained of no clean section with a rm -rf %{
Where would you like bug reports?
I tried it against one of my own review tickets. It found a number of
issues however almost all of them except one was wrong.
For example it complained of no clean section with a rm -rf %{buildroot}
which the specfile contained, same message except in the ins
On 07/19/2012 09:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:20 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Thanks Pierre,
Unfortunately there is no such file .config/fedora-review there is
however a .config/fedora-create-review.
I went a little bit too fast, the file is
~/.config/fedora-r
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:20 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> Thanks Pierre,
>
> Unfortunately there is no such file .config/fedora-review there is
> however a .config/fedora-create-review.
I went a little bit too fast, the file is
~/.config/fedora-review/settings
Pierre
> On 07/19/2012 01
Thanks Pierre,
Unfortunately there is no such file .config/fedora-review there is
however a .config/fedora-create-review.
On 07/19/2012 01:12 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:14 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
I tried to use fedora-review and it seems to
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:14 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> Hello,
>
>I tried to use fedora-review and it seems to attempt building the
> package using Fedora 14?
>
> from root.log
>
> rootdir = /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/root/
>
> Is that intentional? A mis-configuration on my par
Hello,
I tried to use fedora-review and it seems to attempt building the
package using Fedora 14?
from root.log
rootdir = /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/root/
Is that intentional? A mis-configuration on my part?
On 07/11/2012 11:23 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Dear all,
A new fedora-re
14 matches
Mail list logo
