Re: Fedora-Atomic 27-20180407.0 compose check report

2018-04-26 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 04/25/2018 05:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 09:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > OK, it wasn't quite 'next week', but :P > > I figured out why this was broken, finally. The 'special' configuration > for the two-week Atomic reports (mail them to a different set of > a

Re: Fedora-Atomic 27-20180407.0 compose check report

2018-04-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 09:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > On 04/07/2018 03:54 AM, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > > No missing expected images. > > > > > > Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) > > > > > > > Can we get these emails to

Re: Fedora-Atomic 27-20180407.0 compose check report

2018-04-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On 04/07/2018 03:54 AM, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > No missing expected images. > > > > Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) > > > > Can we get these emails to go to ato...@lists.fedoraproject.org? They're actually supposed to, and th

Re: Fedora-Atomic 27-20180407.0 compose check report

2018-04-07 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 04/07/2018 03:54 AM, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) > Can we get these emails to go to ato...@lists.fedoraproject.org? Dusty ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o