Re: F36 Change: Ruby 3.1 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-01-28 Thread Pavel Valena
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:08 AM Jun Aruga wrote: > > > Will version 3.0 remain available as module in F36? And if so, in the full > > extension with all packages as currently in F35 (i.e. including e.g. rails, > > db connectors, etc, things that are missing in the 2.7 module). But not the rest

Re: F36 Change: Ruby 3.1 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-01-28 Thread Jun Aruga
> Will version 3.0 remain available as module in F36? And if so, in the full > extension with all packages as currently in F35 (i.e. including e.g. rails, > db connectors, etc, things that are missing in the 2.7 module). Yes, we always keep the old version of Rubies as a module. So, we will buil

Re: F36 Change: Ruby 3.1 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-01-28 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 27.01.2022 um 21:13 schrieb Vít Ondruch : > > Just to let everybody know, Ruby 3.1 has landed in Rawhide [1]. The binary > packages have been rebuilt, but there might be other compatibility issue. If > you need help fixing your package, please come to discuss the issue to > ruby-sig ML.

Re: F36 Change: Ruby 3.1 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-01-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Just to let everybody know, Ruby 3.1 has landed in Rawhide [1]. The binary packages have been rebuilt, but there might be other compatibility issue. If you need help fixing your package, please come to discuss the issue to ruby-sig ML. Vít [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-