On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Friday, January 13, 2017 5:54:41 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> Doh I missed this. This is now approved due to "bootstrapping issue". So
>> the
>> way to use "old" pkgconfig is (in case of FTBFS)?
>
> Reading again the proposal, there'
On Friday, January 13, 2017 5:54:41 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Doh I missed this. This is now approved due to "bootstrapping issue". So the
> way to use "old" pkgconfig is (in case of FTBFS)?
Reading again the proposal, there's compatibility layer -- but the old
implementation nowhere (Obsole
Doh I missed this. This is now approved due to "bootstrapping issue". So the
way to use "old" pkgconfig is (in case of FTBFS)?
Pavel
On Thursday, January 5, 2017 11:53:38 AM CET Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 09:20 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > = System Wide Change: pkgconf as system
Hello,
Owen Taylor wrote:
> I think it would be really helpful to know a bit more background - who
> are the people developing pkgconf, how did the project start?
I am one of the primary maintainers of pkgconf.
It started initially, to provide a library interface for various tools to make
use o
On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 09:20 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = System Wide Change: pkgconf as system pkg-config implementation =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/pkgconf_as_system_pkg-config_i
> mplementation
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Igor Gnatenko
> * Neal Gompa
>
> This change switches Fedora
