Re: F23 Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview

2015-07-08 Thread Parag Nemade
Hi, On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:47 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth < tchollingswo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > So this was discussed at today's FESCo meeting[1]. Basically, we're not > > sure that it makes sense to have both interpreters in the distr

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview

2015-07-05 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > So this was discussed at today's FESCo meeting[1]. Basically, we're not > sure that it makes sense to have both interpreters in the distribution, > particularly since they are merging back together in the future. > > Would you be willing

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview

2015-07-01 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 13:53 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:56 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Peter Robinson < > > pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Why are we even bothering with this when io.js is merging back > > > into > > >

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview

2015-06-24 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:56 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> Why are we even bothering with this when io.js is merging back into >> node.js so from what I can see is that io.js won't really be around >> for much longer > > That's exactly

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview

2015-06-24 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Josef Stribny wrote: > Exactly my thoughts. Plus also introducing another v8 package because of > that? Having io.js' v8 as well should actually be a good thing for the distribution. Unlike node.js, which sticks with the same v8 released with a particular version

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview

2015-06-24 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Why are we even bothering with this when io.js is merging back into > node.js so from what I can see is that io.js won't really be around > for much longer That's exactly why we're bothering with it. Everything in it will be in the nodejs

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview

2015-06-24 Thread Josef Stribny
On 06/24/2015 10:21 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/iojs Change owner(s): T.C. Hollingsworth io.js is an npm compatible platform originally based o

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview

2015-06-24 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/iojs > > Change owner(s): T.C. Hollingsworth > > io.js is an npm compatible platform originally based on Node.js™ that > supports version 6 o

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview

2015-06-24 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 24.6.2015 v 01:52 Jan Kurik napsal(a): > -- Package and build a special v8 package for io.js only. > Hmmm ... What is it? Is it fork? Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject