On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Tacking a .debug into EXTRARELEASE for the usual rawhide case might still be
>> a
>> good idea. I'll look into that tomorrow.
>
> FYI, I committed a changed to do thi this morning. It should be in tomorrow's
> rawhide and whatever kernel we
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> But I just had another variant of this idea: could the string "debug" be
>> embedded in the release string of the kernel? (and wire this up in the
>> specfile so that it's automatically added)
>>
>> so e.g.
>> kernel-3.3.0-0.rc3.git6.2.fc18
>>
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 16:38 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 15:16 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 14:40:53 -0500,
> > David Malcolm wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mi
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:38 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> My question was about "at runtime": my thinking was that it's useful to
> spell out to the user that they shouldn't expect the final released
> performance from the current system, perhaps adding a message somewhere
> in the UI, so that certa
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 15:16 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 14:40:53 -0500,
> David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > > Just seeing if it's just me, or we bac
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 14:40:53 -0500,
David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
> > > testing with the debug options a
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:40 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> > Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
>> > testing with the debug options and the kerne
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
> > testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a F16 kernel and
> > is little better than F17 3.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
> > testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a F16 kernel and
> > is little better than F17 3.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/16/2012 12:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 10:44 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again
>> during testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a
>> F16 kernel and
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 10:44 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
> testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a F16 kernel and
> is little better than F17 3.3 kernels.
'back'? Debug-enabled kernels have been extremely slow sinc
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
> testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a F16 kernel and
> is little better than F17 3.3 kernels.
the first -rc build of each kernel release has de
12 matches
Mail list logo
