On 03/18/2012 05:38 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 03:02 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> On 03/18/2012 05:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 18, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Question then would be, can I do a yum upgrade to go from F16 to F17 or
On 03/19/2012 03:02 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 03/18/2012 05:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Mar 18, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Question then would be, can I do a yum upgrade to go from F16 to F17 or
>>> F18 if things aren't fixed for F17?
>>>
>> Might work. Not tested.
On 03/18/2012 05:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>
>> Question then would be, can I do a yum upgrade to go from F16 to F17 or
>> F18 if things aren't fixed for F17?
>>
> Might work. Not tested. What you're after is preupgrade.
> http://fedorapro
On Mar 18, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> Question then would be, can I do a yum upgrade to go from F16 to F17 or
> F18 if things aren't fixed for F17?
Might work. Not tested. What you're after is preupgrade.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
On 03/17/2012 12:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 00:17 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>>
>> And for anyone interested in the history of 3D graphics hardware here's
>> an article with a lot of good hardware photos and info:
>>
>>
>> http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 16:36:07 +0100,
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
They didn't list the rv280 / ATI 9200, which was a very nice card.
It was reasonably priced and didn't need a fan on the card.
That's still the graphics card on my primary computer. :-)
I still have one in
PS (I forgot to mention that in my previous reply):
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> They didn't list the rv280 / ATI 9200, which was a very nice card.
> It was reasonably priced and didn't need a fan on the card.
And for several years, it was the best chipset with Free drivers.
Kevin Kofler
--
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> They didn't list the rv280 / ATI 9200, which was a very nice card.
> It was reasonably priced and didn't need a fan on the card.
That's still the graphics card on my primary computer. :-)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 21:51:19 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, that's pretty good. Don't see any big mistakes, and they even got
the i740 in there. Solid 8 or 9 out of 10 I'd say.
I wish they had included chip set names for more of the cards.
They didn't list the rv280 / ATI 9200, whic
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 00:17 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 03/16/2012 06:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 23:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> >> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>
> >>> It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver
> >>> against a d
On 03/16/2012 06:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 23:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>> It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver
>>> against a debug kernel without tweaking something somewhere. It works
>>> fine
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 23:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver
> > against a debug kernel without tweaking something somewhere. It works
> > fine if you use a non-debug kernel.
>
> Not really: https://bugzil
Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver
> against a debug kernel without tweaking something somewhere. It works
> fine if you use a non-debug kernel.
Not really: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751891
Anything dlopening libGL direc
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 17:01 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 03/16/2012 02:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:31 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
>
On 03/16/2012 02:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:31 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:31 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> > On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same p
On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same problem.
>>>
>>> Graphics is Geforce FX 5600
>>>
>>>
>>
On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same problem.
>>
>> Graphics is Geforce FX 5600
>>
> Ah. Then that'll be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745202 .
>
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same problem.
>
> Graphics is Geforce FX 5600
Ah. Then that'll be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745202 .
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter
Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same problem.
Graphics is Geforce FX 5600
On 03/15/2012 09:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 17:45 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Ok, I'll give that a tr
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 17:45 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
> > Ok, I'll give that a try.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> I suggest netinst.iso or livecd, and enable all the repos in anaconda,
> so that your installation is current from the first boot.
And if y
On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> Ok, I'll give that a try.
>
> Thanks.
I suggest netinst.iso or livecd, and enable all the repos in anaconda, so that
your installation is current from the first boot.
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
Ok, I'll give that a try.
Thanks.
On 03/15/2012 07:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> Can someone point out what is needed here or do I just file bug reports?
>>
> I'd suggest installing something more recent, like F17 Beta TC1.
> http://dl.
On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
> Can someone point out what is needed here or do I just file bug reports?
I'd suggest installing something more recent, like F17 Beta TC1.
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/17-Beta.TC1/
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.f
24 matches
Mail list logo
