On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:22:35PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Additionally, I have some RFE's too. ;)
>
> - Could you add a 'q' for quit or something. Or at least not catch
> control-c? If I am in the middle of doing something and need to
> reboot or wander off, I would perfer to be able to
Additionally, I have some RFE's too. ;)
- Could you add a 'q' for quit or something. Or at least not catch
control-c? If I am in the middle of doing something and need to
reboot or wander off, I would perfer to be able to just stop.
- Perhaps also a 'n' and 'p' for next and previous ? If I
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:51:34PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>> The biggest query command I would like at the moment is something like:
>>
>> fedora-easy-karma --list # lists packages to be voted on.
>> fedora-easy-karma --list-new # l
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
>> > Also thanks for packaging that immediately -- what about installing it
>> > by default? It's a tiny package and we really do want our users to
>> > provide feedback.
>>
>> I do not mind, if it is
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:51:34PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The biggest query command I would like at the moment is something like:
>
> fedora-easy-karma --list # lists packages to be voted on.
> fedora-easy-karma --list-new # list pacakges I haven't voted on already.
fedora-easy-kar
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:34:15AM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>> 1) Comments could allow for multi-line code. I tried to paste stuff in
>> and well skipped a couple of packages from the paste :)
>
> Do you have any wish about how this s
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:34:15AM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> 1) Comments could allow for multi-line code. I tried to paste stuff in
> and well skipped a couple of packages from the paste :)
Do you have any wish about how this should behave? I was thinking that
e.g. a comment like " 2)
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
> > Also thanks for packaging that immediately -- what about installing it
> > by default? It's a tiny package and we really do want our users to
> > provide feedback.
>
> I do not mind, if it is installed by default, but I am not sure,
> whether this is a
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Good news everyone,
>
> you can probably expect to receive more positive bodhi karma for your
> updates in the future (or you already got unexpected much), because
> there is now a script called 'fedora-easy-karma'[0], that makes
> providing feedb
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 01:29:28AM +0100, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
> Also thanks for packaging that immediately -- what about installing it
> by default? It's a tiny package and we really do want our users to
> provide feedback.
I do not mind, if it is installed by default, but I am not sure,
whe
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:51:52PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > You need to update packages from updates-testing first and then it's
> > useful to run it. Please look at the wiki for example output.
>
> Would your script break, say, if he was using the bodhi-client from
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:19 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> If you know which pkgs you've installed that were from updates-testing you
> can run:
>
>
> yumdb set from_repo updates-testing pkg_name
>
> and that should do it.
Yes, that fixed it. So the name has to be "updates-testing" in the repo
f
Till Maas wrote:
> You need to update packages from updates-testing first and then it's
> useful to run it. Please look at the wiki for example output.
Would your script break, say, if he was using the bodhi-client from
updates-testing that is broken?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapro
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:42:19PM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 14:06 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:50 -0500 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> [0] https://
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 07:50:43AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Given the obvious utility of this script, can we get it added to the
> fedora-packager package? It doesn't make a lot of sense to have
> developers downloading a script off a wiki to use this.
It's (going to be) in the fedora-pa
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:42:19PM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 14:06 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:50 -0500 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
> > > On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > > > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Easy_Karma
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 14:06 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:50 -0500 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
> > On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Easy_Karma
> >
> >
> > Given the obvious utility of this script, can we get it
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:50 -0500 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
> On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Easy_Karma
>
>
> Given the obvious utility of this script, can we get it added to the
> fedora-packager package? It doesn't make a lot of se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Good news everyone,
>
> you can probably expect to receive more positive bodhi karma for your
> updates in the future (or you already got unexpected much), because
> there is now a script called 'fedora-easy-
On 6.3.2010 23:21, Till Maas wrote:
> Good news everyone,
>
> you can probably expect to receive more positive bodhi karma for your
> updates in the future (or you already got unexpected much), because
> there is now a script called 'fedora-easy-karma'[0], that makes
> providing feedback a lot easi
20 matches
Mail list logo
