On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:22:37 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Correction:
>
> Bug 1085761 looks like the main bug, should we marked bug 1185565 was
> duplicated of 1085761 ?
>
The answer is found in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1185565#c2
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
yeah
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203046.html
but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085761
Correction:
Bug 1085761 looks like the main bug, should we marked bug 1185565 was
duplicated of 1085761 ?
On Ter, 2015-02-24 at 22:39 +0800, Christopher
yeah
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203046.html
but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085761
looks like the main bug 1185565 should be marked was duplicated of
1085761
On Ter, 2015-02-24 at 22:39 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> https://lists.fedorap
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203045.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1185565
May help.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code o
