On 01/09/2018 03:16 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
So after all I would file bug against DNF to automatically mark all packages
from non-primary arch (given they are non-noarch) as allowuinstall.
I don't really understand what you wrote.
I doubt there is an automated solution without packaging chan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 15:05 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 01/09/2018 03:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Well, from my user perspective I think they are supported "as long as it
> > works". The multilib generation is very hacky/tricky.
> >
> > I
On 01/09/2018 03:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Well, from my user perspective I think they are supported "as long as it
works". The multilib generation is very hacky/tricky.
I would open a ticket for releng to fix such issues.
I don't think there is anything wrong with the composes. It is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 13:06 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Changes in the Fedora releng dropped glibc-headers.i686 from the x86_64
> compose after the Fedora 26 release. This is not in itself a problem
> (glibc-devel.i686 is fine if its dependency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 14:12 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.01.2018, 13:06 +0100 schrieb Florian Weimer:
> > Changes in the Fedora releng dropped glibc-headers.i686 from the
> > x86_64
> > compose after the Fedora 26 relea
Am Dienstag, den 09.01.2018, 13:06 +0100 schrieb Florian Weimer:
> Changes in the Fedora releng dropped glibc-headers.i686 from the
> x86_64
> compose after the Fedora 26 release. This is not in itself a
> problem
> (glibc-devel.i686 is fine if its dependency is matched by
> glibc-headers.x86_6
