Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-24 Thread Michael Scherer
Le mardi 22 novembre 2011 à 13:20 -0500, Aleksandar Kurtakov a écrit : > As much as we have disagreed on the previous topic we might have similar > thoughts here :). > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > > > S

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-24 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Excerpts from Kevin Kofler's message of Tue Nov 22 19:24:22 +0100 2011: > Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > I wouldn't want to get rid of the ownership model altogether, I think > > there should be a specific person responsible for handling bug > > reports/RFEs. When a group is responsible to handle somet

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2011-11-22 klockan 17:51 + skrev "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": > What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current > package ownership model? ownership is some times misappropriated with others doing all the work, but it's also of little practical meaning in the end. Would pro

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" [22/11/2011 19:28] : > > What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current > package ownership model? Pro: it enforces responsibility. The way things currently work, it's relatively obvious whose work it is to fix a given bug. Con: the thing that kicked

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 13:20 -0500, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence > > would > > make every contributor an "proven packager"? > > Well, everyone becoming a proven packager is going too far from the > beginning. > Though I have to s

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 11/22/2011 06:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:51:31 + > "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > >> What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current >> package ownership model? >> >> Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence >> would make e

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:51:31 +, JBG (Jóhann) wrote: > What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current > package ownership model? Understand a package's owners as some sort of micro-SIG. The people who sign up as a package's team of owners are the ones who want to be respons

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Jef Spaleta
2011/11/22 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : > What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current > package ownership model? I can't speak for anyone else. But for me I'm more than willing to see other contributors work with me to fix things in packages that I "own." I'll even take the hea

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
> > As much as we have disagreed on the previous topic we might have similar > thoughts here :). > > - Original Message - >> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" >> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" >> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 7:51:31 PM >> Subject: Dropping the owner

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:51:31 + "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current > package ownership model? > > Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence > would make every contributor an "proven packager"? I'm not sur

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 11/22/2011 06:51 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current > package ownership model? ownership <=> responsibility > Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence would > make every contributor an "proven packager"

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Miloslav Trmač wrote: > I wouldn't want to get rid of the ownership model altogether, I think > there should be a specific person responsible for handling bug > reports/RFEs. When a group is responsible to handle something not > really pleasant to do, often no single member of that group feels > p

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
As much as we have disagreed on the previous topic we might have similar thoughts here :). - Original Message - > From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 7:51:31 PM > Subject: Dropping the ownership model >

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 11/22/2011 05:59 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > 2011/11/22 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": >> What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current >> package ownership model? >> >> Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence would >> make every contributor an "proven pack

Re: Dropping the ownership model

2011-11-22 Thread Miloslav Trmač
2011/11/22 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : > What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current > package ownership model? > > Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence would > make every contributor an "proven packager"? Allowing any packager to commit to most pack