On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38:21AM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I went back and forth on this one but couldn't figure out how to put it in.
> Perhaps, marked as optional and introduced by something like: If you want to
> take a more active role in watching what your sponsoree does and correcting
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:20:08PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:08:36PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> > packager group. We want to encourage more sponsors to take on people that
> > are
> > not yet good packagers but have the potential to grow into good packager
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:20:08PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:08:36PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> > packager group. We want to encourage more sponsors to take on people that
> > are
> > not yet good packagers but have the potential to grow into good packager
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:08:36PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> packager group. We want to encourage more sponsors to take on people that are
> not yet good packagers but have the potential to grow into good packagers with
> a little mentoring.
>
> Updated policy drafts are here:
> https://
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:03:37PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_sponsor_responsibilities%28draft%29
>
> It says "package sponsor" in the URL, in the heading and in the second
> paragraph. I think it should be "packager sponsor" as
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_sponsor_responsibilities%28draft%29
It says "package sponsor" in the URL, in the heading and in the second
paragraph. I think it should be "packager sponsor" as the sponsor sponsors a
packager, not a package.
Björn Persson
signat
