Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

On 12.12.2017 16:52, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2017-12-12 16:17 GMT+01:00 Miro Hrončok : On 7.12.2017 10:56, Matthias Runge wrote: To follow-up on this, I'm drafting a change[1]. Since my responsibilities changed, this has a quite low priority for me. Any help is greatly appreciated! Best, Matth

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

2017-12-12 16:17 GMT+01:00 Miro Hrončok : > On 7.12.2017 10:56, Matthias Runge wrote: >> >> To follow-up on this, I'm drafting a change[1]. Since my >> responsibilities changed, this has a quite low priority for me. >> Any help is greatly appreciated! >> >> Best, >> Matthias >> [1] https://fedorapr

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

On 7.12.2017 10:56, Matthias Runge wrote: To follow-up on this, I'm drafting a change[1]. Since my responsibilities changed, this has a quite low priority for me. Any help is greatly appreciated! Best, Matthias [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mrunge/Django20 Today, we proposed https://

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 10:26:11AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Lumir Balhar wrote: > > On 12/05/2017 04:27 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Maybe a Fedora Change coordinating this would be nice? > > probably a good idea. To follow-up on this, I'm drafting

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2017-12-06 10:26 GMT+01:00 Matthias Runge : > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Lumir Balhar wrote: > >> On 12/05/2017 04:27 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > Maybe a Fedora Change coordinating this would be nice? > > > > probably a

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

2017-12-06 10:26 GMT+01:00 Matthias Runge : > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Lumir Balhar wrote: >> On 12/05/2017 04:27 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> > Maybe a Fedora Change coordinating this would be nice? > > probably a good idea. > >> > Those are packages that require python(2)-django an

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Lumir Balhar wrote: > On 12/05/2017 04:27 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Maybe a Fedora Change coordinating this would be nice? probably a good idea. > > Those are packages that require python(2)-django and are themselves not > > prefixed with python(2)-djan

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

On 12/05/2017 04:27 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: Django 2.0 was released quite recently. While it is mostly compatible with earlier versions, the SIGNIFICANT change is, to drop support for Python 2. Maybe a Fedora Change coordinating this would be nice? Hi, Another option is to create a new "pyth

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

Django 2.0 was released quite recently. While it is mostly compatible with earlier versions, the SIGNIFICANT change is, to drop support for Python 2. Maybe a Fedora Change coordinating this would be nice? Hi, Another option is to create a new "python2-django" package containing the latest Dj

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:45:54AM +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: > > Django 2.0 was released quite recently. While it is mostly compatible with > > earlier versions, the SIGNIFICANT change is, to drop support for Python 2. > > > > I'm intending to update Django in Rawhide to 2.0 in 2 weeks. If you'r

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

On 12/05/2017 09:19 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: Hello, tl;dr if you're not maintaining/using a Django related package, you can safely skip this message. Django 2.0 was released quite recently. While it is mostly compatible with earlier versions, the SIGNIFICANT change is, to drop support for Pyt