Re: Disable a package for Fedora 26

2018-01-10 Thread Jonny Heggheim
On 01/09/2018 10:09 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jonny Heggheim wrote: >> I think the best solution, based on my knowledge and available time, is >> to upgrade Fedora 26 to the latest upstream. > So please do that then. The sooner, the better. I agree, pushed updates to bodhi yesterday, it would be g

Re: Disable a package for Fedora 26

2018-01-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jonny Heggheim wrote: > I think the best solution, based on my knowledge and available time, is > to upgrade Fedora 26 to the latest upstream. So please do that then. The sooner, the better. > The fixes from upstream are spread on several commits and releases. That is also the case with, e.g., F

Re: Disable a package for Fedora 26

2018-01-09 Thread Jonny Heggheim
Hi Kevin, thanks for your feedback. On 01/09/2018 11:36 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > … if you can't do the backport in a reasonable time frame (This > vulnerability is very critical, since it allows remote money stealing!), the > recommendation is to just upgrade to the latest upstream immediately

Re: Disable a package for Fedora 26

2018-01-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jonny Heggheim wrote: > We just pused a urgent security update for Electrum for Fedora 27 and > rawhide, Fedora 26 is still affected. > > All versions of Electrum is affected by this bug, Fedora 26 still runs > an older version because of big changes in Electrum 3.0 and an updated > version of a d

Re: Disable a package for Fedora 26

2018-01-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 01/08/2018 06:20 AM, Jonny Heggheim wrote: > Hi! > > We just pused a urgent security update for Electrum for Fedora 27 and > rawhide, Fedora 26 is still affected. > > All versions of Electrum is affected by this bug, Fedora 26 still runs > an older version because of big changes in Electrum 3.