On 12/06/2012 05:39 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
Are we talking about something like this:
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/471217-autotest/virt02.qa/rpmguard/results/libmemcached-1.0.14-.html
and this:
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/471217-autotest/virt02.qa/rpmguard/results/libmemcach
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 07:39 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 23:24 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Ville Skyttä
> > > wrote:
> > > IMO if a maintainer of a shared lib package goes as far as
> > > submitting a
> >
> On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 23:24 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Ville Skyttä
> > wrote:
> > IMO if a maintainer of a shared lib package goes as far as
> > submitting a
> > koji build without noticing a soname bump in it, the
> >
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 23:24 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Ville Skyttä
> wrote:
> IMO if a maintainer of a shared lib package goes as far as
> submitting a
> koji build without noticing a soname bump in it, the
> maintainer s
Hi
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> IMO if a maintainer of a shared lib package goes as far as submitting a
> koji build without noticing a soname bump in it, the maintainer should
> seriously consider stepping aside and finding someone else to take
> proper care of the pack
On 2012-12-04 20:30, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:51:17AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>> I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea in the packaging
>> guidelines to suggest that people list the shared libraries in the
>> %files section like:
>>
>> %{_libdir}/libname.so.#
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:51:17AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/04/2012 09:32 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> >If you're building an update for Fedora, and it has shared libraries or
> >versioned provides, look to see if any of the shared library versions
> >have changed (or if the versioned pro
