Re: Deja DUP

2013-01-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rahul Sundaram wrote: > The other poster has referred to the deja-dup documentation but fyi, > refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892063. This is > partly a fallout of the /tmp on tmpfs default in Fedora 18 Yet another example of how /tmp of tmpfs is a totally braindead and in

Re: Deja DUP

2013-01-19 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Richard Vickery < richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gang, > > I backed up some sensitive files with DUP and upgraded to F18. Now calling > up the Deja DUP program sends the computer into a mode where nothing is > available; it doesn't respond to any key

Re: Deja DUP

2013-01-18 Thread Dan Young
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Richard Vickery < richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gang, > > I backed up some sensitive files with DUP and upgraded to F18. Now calling > up the Deja DUP program sends the computer into a mode where nothing is > available; it doesn't respond to any key-stro

Re: deja dup

2011-11-13 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Richard Vickery < richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > It doesn't give me the option to do a bug report. I just get a box saying > that "Restore Failed" and giving me "Invalid data - SHA1 hash mismatch: > Calculated hash: da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709 >

Re: deja dup

2011-11-13 Thread Richard Vickery
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 11/14/2011 01:12 AM, Richard Vickery wrote: > > Hi Gang: > > > > I just yesterday installed Fedora16 and have found that Deja Dup won't > > completely restore. I thought it was me, but installing a previous backup > > did not work eithe

Re: deja dup

2011-11-13 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 11/14/2011 01:12 AM, Richard Vickery wrote: > Hi Gang: > > I just yesterday installed Fedora16 and have found that Deja Dup won't > completely restore. I thought it was me, but installing a previous backup > did not work either How long do you think it will be before we can get this > working?