On 2011-07-30 9:44, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> I tried using
> %global gccver %(gcc -dumpversion)
> %if %{gccver}>= 4.6.0
>foo here
> %endif
>
> to conditionalize usage of quadruple precision support in a spec file
> that ships on multiple distros, but the comparison gives the error
>
> par
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:39:24 +0100
Niels de Vos wrote:
> Watch out, this is very dangerous! You are comparing strings, not
> versions:
> >>> print '4.6.2' >= '4.6.12'
> True
Thanks... I was testing with to low numbers... :(
> The better way would be to use distutils.version:
> >>> from distutils
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 09:38:29PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:44:41 +0300
> Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I tried using
> > %global gccver %(gcc -dumpversion)
> > %if %{gccver} >= 4.6.0
> > foo here
> > %endif
> >
> > to conditionalize usage of quadru
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:44:41 +0300
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I tried using
> %global gccver %(gcc -dumpversion)
> %if %{gccver} >= 4.6.0
> foo here
> %endif
>
> to conditionalize usage of quadruple precision support in a spec file
> that ships on multiple distros, but the compariso
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:50:51 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm just guessing here, but I think because of the dots it's returning
> a string instead of a number which makes the >= comparison invalid. Is
> there another gcc option that will give you a "dotless" version
> number?
>
> I would try some
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:05:12 +0300
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 07:44 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to check if the gcc version is sufficient with some
> > rpm macro?
>
> Do you actually need to have it as a macro? Often cases like this can
> be handled with plain shell
On 07/30/2011 07:44 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> Is there a way to check if the gcc version is sufficient with some rpm
> macro?
Do you actually need to have it as a macro? Often cases like this can
be handled with plain shell code in %prep, %build, etc. Or by patching
the build system to do the
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Jussi Lehtola
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I tried using
> %global gccver %(gcc -dumpversion)
> %if %{gccver} >= 4.6.0
> foo here
> %endif
>
> to conditionalize usage of quadruple precision support in a spec file
> that ships on multiple distros, but the comparison give
