Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 05:21:58PM -0400, Paul Frields wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 7:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:48:14AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jaroslav Mracek > > wrote: > > > >

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-17 Thread Jaroslav Mracek
I agree. The thread was created by community to ask community what should be the minimal scope to approve the change proposal. As a DNF team lead I would be very happy to get any input from community, because it will help us to prioritize tasks. Jaroslav

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-12 Thread Paul Frields
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 7:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:48:14AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jaroslav Mracek > wrote: > > > > > > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is > requ

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-11 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/11/22 15:17, Stephen Smoogen wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 07:54, Panu Matilainen > wrote: On 10/10/22 10:15, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for particular command? Why is it impor

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-11 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 07:54, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 10/10/22 10:15, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required > for particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want > to resolve it? Commands has multiple options

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-11 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/10/22 10:15, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want to resolve it? Commands has multiple options and some of them could be unused. Specially repoquery has t

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-11 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:48:14AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > > > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for > > particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want to > > resolve

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-11 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for > particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want to > resolve it? Commands has multiple options and some of them could be unused. > Spe

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-10 Thread Jaroslav Mracek
Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want to resolve it? Commands has multiple options and some of them could be unused. Specially repoquery has tons of options. Knowing critical usercase wi

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:11 AM Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > Some of mine: > > - `dnf repoquery` -- Currently, `dnf5 repoquery` nowhere near meets the > capabilities of the old version. This is the most important to me. I agree, repoquery is an absolutely essential tool for me. Without it, it

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-06 Thread Tommy Nguyen
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 13:53 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:20:47PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > Hi Fedorians, > > > > I think we should define a more through list of blockers/criteria > > that > > dnf5 needs to meet before it can replace the current dnf. >

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:20:47PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > Hi Fedorians, > > I think we should define a more through list of blockers/criteria that > dnf5 needs to meet before it can replace the current dnf. > > The DNF maintainers have their list of requirements, but it would be > he

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-05 Thread Tommy Nguyen
On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 22:10 -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > On Wed Oct 5, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > Hi Fedorians, > > > > I think we should define a more through list of blockers/criteria > > that > > dnf5 needs to meet before it can replace the current dnf. > > > > The DNF maint

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-05 Thread Maxwell G via devel
On Wed Oct 5, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > Hi Fedorians, > > I think we should define a more through list of blockers/criteria that > dnf5 needs to meet before it can replace the current dnf. > > The DNF maintainers have their list of requirements, but it would be > helpful for the wider comm