On 2013-05-07, 15:16 GMT, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> I wouldn't be much worried about that project. See the date of that
>> page and state of the (non-)consolidation in the current Fedora.
>
> We should be worried. The proliferance of basement crypto is a real
> problem.
I haven't said or meant that
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:24:29PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 11:16 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 May 2013, Matej Cepl wrote:
> >
> > > Subject: Re: Concern about FedoraCryptoConsolidation
> > >
> > > On 2013
Richard Levenberg wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation
While I understand the reasons for this idea of Consolidation I have a
concern that very valid use cases are being ignored or unknown. As an
example I have a use case supported with curl and OpenSSL like this:
cur
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 11:16 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2013, Matej Cepl wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: Concern about FedoraCryptoConsolidation
> >
> > On 2013-05-07, 04:10 GMT, Richard Levenberg wrote:
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryp
On Tue, 7 May 2013, Matej Cepl wrote:
Subject: Re: Concern about FedoraCryptoConsolidation
On 2013-05-07, 04:10 GMT, Richard Levenberg wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation
While I understand the reasons for this idea of Consolidation I have a
concern that very
On 2013-05-07, 04:10 GMT, Richard Levenberg wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation
>
> While I understand the reasons for this idea of Consolidation I have a
> concern that very valid use cases are being ignored or unknown. As an
> example I have a use case supported with