On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hi John.
>
> On 06/15/2014 08:43 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>>> These compilations have been particularly annoying because it was
>>> nearly impossible to compile on my PC without blocks dependent by
>>> *high* memory usage.
>>
>> How much RAM
>
> Given today's memory prices ... just buy an additional ram stick and
> be done with it ;)
>
I wish but my hardware does not support more than 4GB of RAM. :(
--
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 06/16/2014 12:12 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Antonio Trande wrote:
>>> To pass these problems, I had to decrease '-O' optimization flag
>>> gradually to '-O1' or '-O0', latest attempt is the removal of '-pipe'
>>> from RPM_OPT_FLAGS.
>>>
>
On 06/16/2014 12:12 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Antonio Trande wrote:
>> To pass these problems, I had to decrease '-O' optimization flag
>> gradually to '-O1' or '-O0', latest attempt is the removal of '-pipe'
>> from RPM_OPT_FLAGS.
>>
>> What's best choice in these cases?
>
> Definitely not -O0, t
> coin-or-lemon is still in f20 updates-testing repos
Please mention such facts early and prominently. It saves time
for those who try to help you.
> So my RAM is not adequate.
It *can* work, but your machine is not configured properly for large compiles:
-
> $ cat /proc/swaps
> Filename
Am 16.06.2014 00:12, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Antonio Trande wrote:
>> To pass these problems, I had to decrease '-O' optimization flag
>> gradually to '-O1' or '-O0', latest attempt is the removal of '-pipe'
>> from RPM_OPT_FLAGS.
>>
>> What's best choice in these cases?
>
> Definitely not -O0, t
Antonio Trande wrote:
> To pass these problems, I had to decrease '-O' optimization flag
> gradually to '-O1' or '-O0', latest attempt is the removal of '-pipe'
> from RPM_OPT_FLAGS.
>
> What's best choice in these cases?
Definitely not -O0, that generates really crappy (slow and large) code. I'd
Hi John.
On 06/15/2014 08:43 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>> These compilations have been particularly annoying because it was
>> nearly impossible to compile on my PC without blocks dependent by
>> *high* memory usage.
>
> How much RAM and swap and free space does the build machine have?
> ("sed 5q <
> These compilations have been particularly annoying because it was
> nearly impossible to compile on my PC without blocks dependent by
> *high* memory usage.
How much RAM and swap and free space does the build machine have?
("sed 5q < /proc/meminfo; cat /proc/swaps; df -h")
The BuildRequires
Errata corrige.
On 06/15/2014 06:03 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> These compilations have been particularly annoying because it was
> nearly impossible to compile on my PC without blocks dependent by
> hardly memory usage.
These compilations have been particularly annoying because it was
nearly imp
10 matches
Mail list logo