On 2015-09-02, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 2.9.2015 v 16:10 Paul Wouters napsal(a):
>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>> 3) Packages are updated, but the bug is kept open
>>
>>> I would suggest probably to close the bugs for 1st category, the
>>> packages from 2nd category should be orpha
On 09/02/2015 06:49 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today, I stumbled upon OPEN bugs [1] link on Upstream Release Monitoring
> wiki page [2]. And the BZ/packages probably deserves cleanup. There are
> several categories I identified as worrying:
>
> 1) Packages are retired but the bugs are k
Dne 2.9.2015 v 16:10 Paul Wouters napsal(a):
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> 3) Packages are updated, but the bug is kept open
>
>> I would suggest probably to close the bugs for 1st category, the
>> packages from 2nd category should be orphaned and the packages from 3rd
>> category s
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Vít Ondruch wrote:
3) Packages are updated, but the bug is kept open
I would suggest probably to close the bugs for 1st category, the
packages from 2nd category should be orphaned and the packages from 3rd
category should not be monitored anymore. Any thoughts?
I would k
Dne 2.9.2015 v 14:52 Christopher Meng napsal(a):
> ovaldi maintainer here. Will update it as soon as possible.
>
> Last time when I tried the update, it's incompatible with rpm 4.12+...
>
This was just random choice out of several other packages, but thank you :)
Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel
ovaldi maintainer here. Will update it as soon as possible.
Last time when I tried the update, it's incompatible with rpm 4.12+...
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedo
