Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 17:07 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:04:05 +0100 > Richard Hughes wrote: > > > On 14 April 2012 22:31, Debarshi Ray wrote: > > > What about using a page on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ ? > > > > Unless I'm mistaken, you can't have more than one perso

Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 12:17 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > We've always built packages coming from the GNOME FTP and that follow > the GNOME releases. Matthias did it, I did it, Tomas did it, and now > Richard is doing it. Hi, hmm, I do not see any x.x.x-1 build being done by any of those

Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-16 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 11:13 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 13:53 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in > > the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add > > the build ID to: > > > > https://doc

Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-16 Thread Richard Hughes
On 16 April 2012 11:32, Milan Crha wrote: > Maybe he's just _currently_ busy, sleeping (consider different > timezones) and so on? Anyway, I never asked to have those packages part > of the auto-build list, and never was asked for acceptance. This is > easily distinguishable, isn't it? I was aske

Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 10:33 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > ... > If you had already updated F17 with the upstream 3.4.1 then > the automatic script would have ignored your package completely. Hey, I didn't have much time to do so. You script stepped in only two hours after release on Gnome

Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-16 Thread Richard Hughes
On 16 April 2012 10:13, Milan Crha wrote: > it will be kind of you to not touch packages you do not own, especially > those which are actively maintained. The way you did it breaks "build > the package like normal" from your instructions. In the same way I've emailed for your two other privately

Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 13:53 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in > the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add > the build ID to: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzB

Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:04:05 +0100 Richard Hughes wrote: > On 14 April 2012 22:31, Debarshi Ray wrote: > > What about using a page on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ ? > > Unless I'm mistaken, you can't have more than one person editing a > wiki page at the same time. Seeing as there's normally

Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-14 Thread Richard Hughes
On 14 April 2012 22:31, Debarshi Ray wrote: > What about using a page on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ ? Unless I'm mistaken, you can't have more than one person editing a wiki page at the same time. Seeing as there's normally 3 or 4 of us building packages simultaneously, it needs to be instan

Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-14 Thread Debarshi Ray
>>> If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in >>> the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add >>> the build ID to: >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHc >> >>Can we not find a way to coord

Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-14 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 15:52:18 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Richard Hughes wrote: If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add the build ID to: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiG

Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-14 Thread Kevin Kofler
Richard Hughes wrote: > If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in > the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add > the build ID to: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHc Can we not find a wa