Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20

2013-10-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 04:03 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 10/07/2013 03:49 AM, Tim Flink wrote: > > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:09:24 -0500 > > Rex Dieter wrote: > > > >> Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>> > I now see ... the vers

Re: AutoQA ??? (was: Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20)

2013-10-07 Thread Kamil Paral
Right, Tim fixed the issue and updates in Bodhi should once again receive comments regarding "depcheck" and "upgradepath" checks. There's an opt-in support for rpmlint/rpmguard checks for every package built (the emails are sent to their maintainers), but I'm not clear whether this opt-in suppo

Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20

2013-10-07 Thread Jiri Popelka
On 10/06/2013 04:06 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: The following need to be reviewed by the maintainer as there's a number of builds or other issues: plymouth cups-filters I've just submitted cups-filters update. I don't see any issues. -- Jiri -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org h

Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20

2013-10-06 Thread Tim Flink
On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 04:03:16 +0200 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 10/07/2013 03:49 AM, Tim Flink wrote: > > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:09:24 -0500 > > Rex Dieter wrote: > > > >> Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>> > I now see ... the ve

Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20

2013-10-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 10/07/2013 03:49 AM, Tim Flink wrote: On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:09:24 -0500 Rex Dieter wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I now see ... the version in f19 was greater than that in f20+rawhide, for whatever reasons. Actually, I wonder wh

Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20

2013-10-06 Thread Tim Flink
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:09:24 -0500 Rex Dieter wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > >> I now see ... the version in f19 was greater than that in > >> f20+rawhide, for whatever reasons. > >> Actually, I wonder why AutoQA did not co

Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20

2013-10-06 Thread Tim Flink
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013 19:27:33 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > I now see ... the version in f19 was greater than that in > > f20+rawhide, for whatever reasons. > > Actually, I wonder why AutoQA did not complain. > > There are no AutoQ

Re: AutoQA ??? (was: Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20)

2013-10-06 Thread Dan Mashal
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:09:24 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> >>> Michael Schwendt wrote: >>> >>> > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> > >>> >> I now see ... the ve

Re: AutoQA ??? (was: Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20)

2013-10-06 Thread Dan Mashal
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:09:24 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >> > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> > >> >> I now see ... the version in f19 was greater than that in f20+rawhide, >> >> for

AutoQA ??? (was: Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20)

2013-10-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:09:24 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > >> I now see ... the version in f19 was greater than that in f20+rawhide, > >> for whatever reasons. > >> Actually, I wonder why AutoQA did not co

Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20

2013-10-06 Thread Rex Dieter
Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> I now see ... the version in f19 was greater than that in f20+rawhide, >> for whatever reasons. >> Actually, I wonder why AutoQA did not complain. > > There are no AutoQA comments in that bodhi ticket at all

Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20

2013-10-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > I now see ... the version in f19 was greater than that in f20+rawhide, > for whatever reasons. > Actually, I wonder why AutoQA did not complain. There are no AutoQA comments in that bodhi ticket at all. Almost as if AutoQA has not been

Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20

2013-10-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 10/06/2013 07:01 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 10/06/2013 04:06 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: fakeroot I don't understand this. With f20/rawhide as of yesterday, fakeroot in f20 and rawhide were identical, because fakeroot was built before f20 was branched: ./development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/

Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20

2013-10-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 10/06/2013 04:06 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: fakeroot I don't understand this. With f20/rawhide as of yesterday, fakeroot in f20 and rawhide were identical, because fakeroot was built before f20 was branched: ./development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/f/fakeroot-1.18.4-1.fc20.src.rpm ./development/

Re: Building and submitting updates for Fedora 20

2013-10-06 Thread Kalev Lember
On 10/06/2013 04:06 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > The following need to be reviewed by the maintainer as there's a > number of builds or other issues: > plymouth > cups-filters I have fixed plymouth: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/plymouth.git/commit/?id=714e0ef -- Kalev -- devel mailing lis