Re: Broken upgrade path(s) detected for: yaml-cpp

2012-04-19 Thread Kamil Paral
> Today I've followed instructions from > http://jlaska.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/fedora-package-maintainers-want-test-results/ > is that right? > > I've run: > > autoqa-optin UpTools F-15 > > Tell me if I'm wrong That is correct if you want to receive rpmlint/rpmguard test output for every new

Re: Broken upgrade path(s) detected for: yaml-cpp

2012-04-18 Thread Kamil Paral
> In addition, I had fixed the script to properly support > updates-testing > repositories eons ago (should not compare fn-1-updates-testing with > fn- > updates), but my patch (attached) was never merged because the script > was to > be obsoleted by AutoQA anyway according to Jesse Keating. AutoQ

Re: Broken upgrade path(s) detected for: yaml-cpp

2012-04-17 Thread Jon Ciesla
Infrastructure is aware of the issue. -J On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Based on the packages and builds I'm getting these for, yes, I'd say > so, probably a script error, but I'm not sure. > > -J > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> Is something w

Re: Broken upgrade path(s) detected for: yaml-cpp

2012-04-17 Thread Jon Ciesla
Based on the packages and builds I'm getting these for, yes, I'd say so, probably a script error, but I'm not sure. -J On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did > push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16..