Re: Broken dependencies in F21 (was: Re: F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes)

2014-11-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 14:40:50 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: [meshmagick] meshmagick-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1 meshmagick-libs-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1 meshmagick has been rebuilt in rawhide and f21 (reques

Re: Broken dependencies in F21 (was: Re: F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes)

2014-10-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:47:29PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote: >> >> [cduce] >> >>cduce-0.5.5-9.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) = >> >> 0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90 >> >> This fails to rebuild: >> https://koji.fedorapro

Re: Broken dependencies in F21 (was: Re: F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes)

2014-10-17 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:47:29PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > >> [cduce] > >>cduce-0.5.5-9.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) = > >> 0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90 > > This fails to rebuild: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7881630 This was waiting for an upst

Re: Broken dependencies in F21 (was: Re: F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes)

2014-10-16 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:40:50 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone > unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the > maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these > don't go unnoticed. > > Doe

Re: Broken dependencies in F21 (was: Re: F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes)

2014-10-16 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 16 October 2014 at 16:47, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone > > unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the > > maintainers are s

Re: Broken dependencies in F21

2014-10-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 10/16/2014 04:47 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: ## json-c soname bump json-c seems to have dropped the /usr/include/json -> /usr/include/json-c symlink. This breaks packages, which depend upon /usr/include/json, e.g. libverto-jsonrpc. Wa

Re: Broken dependencies in F21

2014-10-16 Thread Kalev Lember
On 10/16/2014 06:16 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > >> [freesteam] freesteam-ascend-2.1-6.20140724svn753.fc21.armv7hl >> requires libascend.so.1 > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-August/201840.html Likely fixed by https://admi

Re: Broken dependencies in F21

2014-10-16 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > [freesteam] freesteam-ascend-2.1-6.20140724svn753.fc21.armv7hl > requires libascend.so.1 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-August/201840.html - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wo

Re: Broken dependencies in F21 (was: Re: F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes)

2014-10-16 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:47:29PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone > > unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the > > maintainers ar

Re: Broken dependencies in F21

2014-10-16 Thread Kalev Lember
On 10/16/2014 02:40 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > [gnome-python2-desktop] >> gnome-python2-metacity-2.32.0-18.fc21.armv7hl requires >> libmetacity-private.so.0 And replying to my own mail, this should be fixed with: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-python2-desktop-2.32.0-20.fc21 --

Re: Broken dependencies in F21 (was: Re: F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes)

2014-10-16 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > Hi all, > > We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone > unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the > maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these > don't go unnotice

Re: Broken dependencies in F21

2014-10-16 Thread Matthias Runge
On 16/10/14 14:40, Kalev Lember wrote: > Hi all, > > We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone > unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the > maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these > don't go unnoticed. > > Does any

Re: Broken dependencies in F21

2014-10-16 Thread Vít Ondruch
Thanks for bringing this up. Speaking of broken Ruby stuff: [rubygem-linecache19] rubygem-linecache19-0.5.13-6.fc20.armv7hl requires libruby.so.2.0 [rubygem-ruby-debug-base19] rubygem-ruby-debug-base19-0.11.26-6.fc20.armv7hl requires libruby.so.2.0 A while ago, I suggested to dr

Re: Broken dependencies in F21 (was: Re: F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes)

2014-10-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 14:40:50 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: Does anyone have ideas how to deal with these packages? I have been meaning to deal with meshmagick. I actually did a small part of the changes locally. The issue is that stricter checking by gcc is resulting in the package not bu