Dear Bryan,
If you think you fixed your package by changing ruby(abi) to
ruby(release) then you don't. Quick look on the RPMs will reveal:
$ rpm -qp -l
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/rubygem-pam/1.5.4/15.fc19/x86_64/rubygem-pam-1.5.4-15.fc19.x86_64.rpm
/builddir/.gem/ruby/cache/
Dne 17.4.2013 01:30, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On 15/04/13 05:30 AM, Josef Stribny wrote:
Hi,
change ruby(abi) to Requires: ruby(release) as in guidelines [1]
"Each Ruby package must indicate it depends on a Ruby interpreter.
Use ruby(release) virtual requirement to achieve that:"
This is
On 15/04/13 05:30 AM, Josef Stribny wrote:
Hi,
change ruby(abi) to Requires: ruby(release) as in guidelines [1]
"Each Ruby package must indicate it depends on a Ruby interpreter. Use ruby(release)
virtual requirement to achieve that:"
This is due to support both MRI and JRuby in next Fedora r
Hi Bryan,
If you are OK with:
* making the .spef file F19+ compatible only
* dropping the ruby-pam sub-package
I can fix the .spec file for you. Please let me know.
Vít
Dne 15.4.2013 13:54, Bryan Kearney napsal(a):
I am not sure how to fix this. The current spec file in master and f19
h
Hi,
change ruby(abi) to Requires: ruby(release) as in guidelines [1]
"Each Ruby package must indicate it depends on a Ruby interpreter. Use
ruby(release) virtual requirement to achieve that: "
This is due to support both MRI and JRuby in next Fedora releases.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
