On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:11:21 -0500
seth vidal wrote:
> should be pretty trivial to implement.
yeah, with a bit of help I figured out how to modify the script that
creates the aliases. Sadly, there's a filtering issue in pkgdb, where
it's not filtering by product properly. ;(
I filed a pkgdb ti
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 11:04 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:32:30 +0100
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > This is due to a flaw in the Fedora PKGNAME-owner aliases and using
> > them also for EPEL. There are no separate aliases for EPEL package
> > ownership.
> >
> > In pkgdb on
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:32:30 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> This is due to a flaw in the Fedora PKGNAME-owner aliases and using
> them also for EPEL. There are no separate aliases for EPEL package
> ownership.
>
> In pkgdb one can see that there is a different owner for the EPEL
> package: http
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:24:56 +0100, Ralf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am mail bombed with mails complaining about broken deps originating
> from those EPEL6-versions of packages I maintain in Fedora.
>
> * I am not these packages' maintainer (I maintain them in Fedora, but do
> not maintain them in EPEL
