Current status update for MATE.
1. Creating an applet for using gnome-bluetooth inside MATE is a death project
for me.
The applet himself is working (thanks kalev), but using gnome-blutooth
properties is a problem since 'properties' isn't a standalone application
anymore and moved to control-ce
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:03:17AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
>
> > Basically we ship Fedora 20 in a state where one only of our major desktop
> > environments supports bluetooth in a stable fashion? That seems kind of
> > like a
>
project.org:
>
> > Message: 13
> > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 01:03:20 +0200
> > From: Kalev Lember
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Subject: Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.
> > Message-ID: <520969b8.1030...@gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plai
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:48:46PM -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Instead of shipping it, is there a problem with giving it to those on
> the developer list and letting us iron out the kinks?
Sure, that's what already happens. If you want to help, this thread
contains a multitude of pointers wher
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 08:55:01AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Have you tried Bluetooth on our major desktop environments in F19? :P
>
> (I kid, I kid, it mostly works well. But still, I have to pair my mouse
> every damn time I want to use it, for instance.)
Oh, is https://bugzilla.redhat.
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 14:28 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> It sounds like BlueZ5 is not ready for Fedora, betwen the "early alpha" XFCE
> code, and shipping git BlueDevil, mate and cinnamon don't appear to work with
> it ...
We're not even at Alpha TC1 yet, remember. It's not unusual for stuff
roadm
On 19/08/2013 4:31 PM, "Richard Vickery"
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Garrett
wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> >
> >> Basically we ship Fedora 20 in a state where one only of our major
desktop
> >> environments supports bluetooth in a s
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
>
>> Basically we ship Fedora 20 in a state where one only of our major desktop
>> environments supports bluetooth in a stable fashion? That seems kind of like
>> a
>> disaster wait
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> Basically we ship Fedora 20 in a state where one only of our major desktop
> environments supports bluetooth in a stable fashion? That seems kind of like
> a
> disaster waiting to happen.
The current release blocking desktops are Gnom
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Ryan Rix wrote:
> On Sun 18 August 2013 10:00:22 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:40:54 +0200
>>
>> Rave it wrote:
>> > I don't see that adding a bluetooth-panel-applet package is easy for
>> > mate/xfce/lxde. First tests shows me that the removed pan
On Sun 18 August 2013 10:00:22 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:40:54 +0200
>
> Rave it wrote:
> > I don't see that adding a bluetooth-panel-applet package is easy for
> > mate/xfce/lxde. First tests shows me that the removed panel code from
> > gnome-bluetooth isn't independent from t
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:40:54 +0200
Rave it wrote:
> I don't see that adding a bluetooth-panel-applet package is easy for
> mate/xfce/lxde. First tests shows me that the removed panel code from
> gnome-bluetooth isn't independent from the the rest of the code. I
> quess for this reason the gnome d
On 08/17/2013 01:47 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Will the bluez-compat be killed in this move?
Yes, already gone in the rawhide package:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/commit/?id=e321c716dddf55724776b8686de01cd7f45cbc4a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754523
--
:19:27
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 15:10 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM,
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 15:10 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> >>> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth
On 08/13/2013 09:44 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 08/13/2013 02:28 PM, Rave it wrote:
Other probs are:
1. gnome-bluetooth upstream has removed the fallback icon for autostart in
session,...no systray icon in other DE than gnome itself.
2. if gnome revert this change in upstream 'OnlyShowIn=MAT
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 15:04 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> >> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this
> >> point in time.
> >
> > Reforking? And then wa
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
>>> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this
>>> point in time.
>>
>> Reforking? And then wait unt
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
>> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this
>> point in time.
>
> Reforking? And then wait until the bitrot sets in again? ;-)
>
> Can't you just use gno
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this
> point in time.
Reforking? And then wait until the bitrot sets in again? ;-)
Can't you just use gnome-bluetooth proper and resurrect the panel icon
stuff like Kale
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 08/13/2013 02:28 PM, Rave it wrote:
>> Other probs are:
>> 1. gnome-bluetooth upstream has removed the fallback icon for autostart in
>> session,...no systray icon in other DE than gnome itself.
>> 2. if gnome revert this change in ups
Am Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:59:15 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> - Original Message -
> > On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20
> >
> > I have been coordinating with various peop
On 08/13/2013 08:06 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> The page looks good, thanks for coordination. Just could you please extend
> the scope with resolution for mate bt? Also for contingency plan, I'd like
> to see a real deadline - Beta as a point to revert things as a coordination
> would be needed. O
- Original Message -
> On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20
>
> I have been coordinating with various people and looks like all teams
> are go. NetworkManager and PulseAudio changes are slightly lagging
- Original Message -
> On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20
>
> I have been coordinating with various people and looks like all teams
> are go. NetworkManager and PulseAudio changes are slightly lagging
On 08/13/2013 02:28 PM, Rave it wrote:
> Other probs are:
> 1. gnome-bluetooth upstream has removed the fallback icon for autostart in
> session,...no systray icon in other DE than gnome itself.
> 2. if gnome revert this change in upstream 'OnlyShowIn=MATE" needs to be
> added.
> 3. Also runt
Am Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:00:01 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:26:05 +0200
> From: Kalev Lember
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>
> Subject: Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.
> Message-ID: <
On 08/13/2013 11:11 AM, Rave it wrote:
> mate-bluetooth doesn't support bluez5, and upstream doesn't have started to
> port it.
> I don't expect that is is ready before f20 alpha or beata.
> So it would be very nice not to push bluez5 into f20.
> Also Cristofph Wickert asked me to clean up runtime
Am Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:34:53 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> Message: 13
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 01:03:20 +0200
> From: Kalev Lember
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.
> Message-ID: <520969b8.1030...@gmail.com&
On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20
I have been coordinating with various people and looks like all teams
are go. NetworkManager and PulseAudio changes are slightly lagging
behind, but it's probably best if we mo
- Original Message -
> On 08/01/2013 07:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I was kind of expecting this would have landed by now though, Bastien
> > will be @ GUADEC this week so not sure if he'll respond quickly
>
> We'll discuss this at GUADEC and I'll follow up here once we figure out
> a
On 08/01/2013 07:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I was kind of expecting this would have landed by now though, Bastien
will be @ GUADEC this week so not sure if he'll respond quickly
We'll discuss this at GUADEC and I'll follow up here once we figure out
a plan what to do.
It's possible that it
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 18:36 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Stefan Held wrote:
> >> What exactly is holding the Updates back in Fedora?
> >> Is there a reason for excluding the 5.x Series?
> >
> >
> >
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Stefan Held wrote:
>> What exactly is holding the Updates back in Fedora?
>> Is there a reason for excluding the 5.x Series?
>
>
> See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bluez5
> and the thread st
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Stefan Held wrote:
> What exactly is holding the Updates back in Fedora?
> Is there a reason for excluding the 5.x Series?
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bluez5
and the thread starting at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013
35 matches
Mail list logo
