On 08/12/15 16:07, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Unfortunately, I don't think this is possible until the Red Hat
> maintainer for libunwind bumps the Release.
>
> RHEL = libunwind-1.1-5
> EPEL = libunwind-1.1-10
>
> If I introduce libunwind-1.1-0.5 then it doesn't mess up RHEL but it
> *does* mess up EPE
On 08/12/15 08:58, Paul Howarth wrote:
> It's not a different version. It's an exact clone of the RHEL package
> except with "0." in front of the release to make sure the RHEL package
> "wins" where it is available. It is in fact the official EPEL
> limited-arch package policy:
>
> https://fedorap
On 07/12/15 17:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
FYI, this discussion might be better on the actual epel-devel list...
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:17:54 +
Paul Howarth wrote:
On 07/12/15 14:59, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
...snip...
Could make a compat package in EPEL7 be an option?
This way you introduce
On 07/12/15 15:33, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> So, in the general case of packages being retired from EPEL7 because
>> they have moved to RHEL, how do we avoid missing packages in the future?
>
> What is the issue with the CR CentOS repository?
It's
FYI, this discussion might be better on the actual epel-devel list...
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:17:54 +
Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 07/12/15 14:59, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
...snip...
> > Could make a compat package in EPEL7 be an option?
> > This way you introduce back the version that was presen
On 07/12/15 14:59, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> So, in the general case of packages being retired from EPEL7 because
>> they have moved to RHEL, how do we avoid missing packages in the future?
>
> Could make a compat package in EPEL7 be an option?
> This way you introduce back the version that was
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> So, in the general case of packages being retired from EPEL7 because
> they have moved to RHEL, how do we avoid missing packages in the future?
What is the issue with the CR CentOS repository?
- Ken
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapro
On 07/12/15 14:59, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:44:30PM +, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
Hi!
libunwind package is now part of RHEL 7.2. It got retired from EPEL7
three days ago (and incidentally the Release went backwards so upgrade
path is broken):
https://bugzilla.redhat
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:44:30PM +, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> libunwind package is now part of RHEL 7.2. It got retired from EPEL7
> three days ago (and incidentally the Release went backwards so upgrade
> path is broken):
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288313
>
> U
