On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:03:52 -0600
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:03:52 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still
> interested in maintaining their packages (and if so, hav
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 15:18:30 -0400
Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 13:03 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are sti
On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 13:03 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so, have
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:53:54 +0200
Matthias Runge wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:11:40PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
...snip...
> > Nikola recently left Red Hat, just reassign whatever packages he
> > had to me.
> >
> > Regards,
> > H.
>
> Thank you Haikel.
>
> I sponsored Nikola. I can take
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:11:40PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> 2016-04-25 18:00 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still intereste
2016-04-25 18:00 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dne 6.1.2016 v 01:07 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>
> If you have a way to contact this maintainer, please let them
> know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages.
> Thanks!
>
> * jklimes - former email: jkli...@redhat.com
>
>
Not su
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 10:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:46:32 -0600
> Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm startin
On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:46:32 -0600
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are s
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still
> interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so, hav
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:10:52 +0100
Juan Hernández wrote:
> On 11/18/2015 12:57 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
> > Adding Juan into the loop. He might be interested.
> >
>
> I'm have been maintaining these package for a while, and I'm
> interested in continue to maintain them. Can you s
Adding Juan into the loop. He might be interested.
On 11/17/2015 01:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaini
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 20:41:48 +0300
Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Sep 2015, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> >for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> >unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still
> >inter
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their em
Thanks Mat!
I was able to touch base with Keiran on IRC...
Affix
I will be updating the package in a few days
been a bit hard pressed with work issues recently
swilkerson
Ok, great! Let me know if you need any help.
Affix
will do thanks for pointing it out
Scott Wilkerson
On 4 September 2015 at 19:26, Scott Wilkerson wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've been trying to get some old CVE's fixed in the nagios package and it
> appears to be falling on deaf ears
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958305
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046333
> https://bug
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:23:43 +1000
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> > On 1 Sep 2015, at 1:15 am, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they a
> On 1 Sep 2015, at 1:15 am, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so, have t
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:01:27 -0700
Jason Rist wrote:
> > Sure. I can reassign them...
> >
> > So to be clear thats:
> >
> > openstack-tuskar
> > openstack-tuskar-ui
> > python-soaplib
> > python-tuskarclient
> >
> > change POC to jrist?
> >
> > kevin
> >
> >
> >
> Yes please. Who is POC on
Done.
2014-11-12 21:01 GMT-02:00 Jason Rist :
> On 11/12/2014 03:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:59:16 +0100
>> Matthias Runge wrote:
>>
>> > Oh yes!
>> >
>> > Accidentally, we didn't solve this earlier.
>> >
>> > The plan, discussed with jomara was, Jason Rist (FAS: jrist) should
>>
On 11/12/2014 03:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:59:16 +0100
> Matthias Runge wrote:
>
> > Oh yes!
> >
> > Accidentally, we didn't solve this earlier.
> >
> > The plan, discussed with jomara was, Jason Rist (FAS: jrist) should
> > take over these packages (and probably python-so
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:59:16 +0100
Matthias Runge wrote:
> Oh yes!
>
> Accidentally, we didn't solve this earlier.
>
> The plan, discussed with jomara was, Jason Rist (FAS: jrist) should
> take over these packages (and probably python-soaplib as well). I
> sponsored him some time ago for exactl
> I'm planning on being the maintainer. What do I need to do to take
> over these packages so that the maintainer is no longer considered
> unresponsive? Some setting for updating the mailing address? Spec update?
If you have a chance to contact Jordan he can assign the packages to you
in pkgdb e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:23:35AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If you have a way to contact this maintainer, please let them
> know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages.
> Thanks!
>
> * jomara - former email address jom...@redha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/10/2014 10:23 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for this
> package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still
> interested in maintai
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:52:27PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so
I've now orphaned the wiggle package.
Interested folks should feel free to pick it up.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/co
On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:18:32 +0200
Ondrej Vasik wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 12:52 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are s
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 12:52 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so, have
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:25:52 -0400 (EDT)
Tomas Hozza wrote:
> Hi Jaromir was an intern at Red Hat and finished today.
> I think it is OK if you remove his acls right away.
ok. I assume then he doesn't want to continue to maintain those
packages?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Original Message -
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
