Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

2014-06-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:57:29 -0400 Andy Grimm wrote: > On Jun 18, 2014 5:28 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote: ...snip... > > * sadmac - former email address cdah...@redhat.com > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/sadmac/ > > Point of contact: 1 > > Co-maintainer:0 > >

Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

2014-06-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:42:10 -0400 Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 18:41 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > * ssp - former email address sandm...@redhat.com > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/ssp/ > > >

Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

2014-06-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 18:41 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > * ssp - former email address sandm...@redhat.com > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/ssp/ > > Point of contact: 39 > > Co-maintainer:254 > > Watched: 0 >

Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

2014-06-26 Thread Andy Grimm
On Jun 18, 2014 5:28 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote: > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package > maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive > maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in > maintaining their packages (and if so, have th

Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

2014-06-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:57:08 + (UTC) Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2014-06-18, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > * tgraf - former email address tg...@redhat.com > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/tgraf/ > > He uses now. It's in his FAS account listed. His > latest post on netdev mailing li

Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

2014-06-19 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2014-06-18, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * tgraf - former email address tg...@redhat.com > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/tgraf/ He uses now. It's in his FAS account listed. His latest post on netdev mailing list was on 2014-06-04, 14 days ago. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

2014-06-18 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * ssp - former email address sandm...@redhat.com > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/ssp/ > Point of contact: 39 > Co-maintainer: 254 > Watched:0 We're reshuffling Søren's packages (in a RHEL ownership sense)

Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

2014-05-15 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 03:57:24PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:11:47AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package > > maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer > > policy t

Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

2014-05-15 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:11:47AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package > maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer > policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their > packages (an

Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

2014-05-12 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:30:27PM +0200, Ondrej Vasik wrote: > > If you don't find any contact for llim, feel free to reassign redhat-lsb > to me - I'm monitoring the bugzillas of redhat-lsb package anyway and > I'm the owner in RHEL. We discussed with Lawrence transfer even in > Fedora, but it n

Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

2014-04-08 Thread Ondrej Vasik
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 10:11 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package > maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer > policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their > packages (and if so